Abstract:S U M M A R YWe perform a comprehensive analysis of dynamic triggering around the Babaoshan and Huangzhuang-Gaoliying faults near Beijing, China. The triggered earthquakes are identified as impulsive seismic arrivals with clear P and S waves in 5 Hz high-pass-filtered three-component velocity seismograms during the passage of large amplitude body and surface waves of large teleseismic earthquakes. We find that this region was repeatedly triggered by four earthquakes in East Asia, including the 2001 M w 7.8 Kun… Show more
“…The mechanical responses of the earth to the great earthquakes were investigated to understand the influence of the great earthquakes (West et al, 2005;Lei et al, 2011;Miyazawa, 2011;Gonzalez-Huizar et al, 2012;Lee and Hong, 2014). Dynamic triggering of microearthquakes was widely observed in active tectonic regions up to tens of thousands of kilometers (Hill et al, 1993;West et al, 2005;Durand et al, 2010;Peng and Gomberg, 2010;Lei et al, 2011;Miyazawa, 2011;Shelly et al, 2011;Wu et al, 2011;Gonzalez-Huizar et al, 2012). In addition, megathrusts accompany large regional stress changes, causing subsequent changes in seismicity properties.…”
“…The mechanical responses of the earth to the great earthquakes were investigated to understand the influence of the great earthquakes (West et al, 2005;Lei et al, 2011;Miyazawa, 2011;Gonzalez-Huizar et al, 2012;Lee and Hong, 2014). Dynamic triggering of microearthquakes was widely observed in active tectonic regions up to tens of thousands of kilometers (Hill et al, 1993;West et al, 2005;Durand et al, 2010;Peng and Gomberg, 2010;Lei et al, 2011;Miyazawa, 2011;Shelly et al, 2011;Wu et al, 2011;Gonzalez-Huizar et al, 2012). In addition, megathrusts accompany large regional stress changes, causing subsequent changes in seismicity properties.…”
“…Indeed, there are reports of triggering of remote activity for many of the recent great events. Examples include triggering in China by the 2003 M w 8.3 Tokachi-Oki and 2004 M w 9.0 Sumatra-Andaman earthquakes (Lei et al, 2011;Wu et al, 2011), triggering in Alaska and the continental United States by the 2004 M w 9.0 Sumatran-Andaman earthquake (West et al, 2005;Rubinstein et al, 2011), triggering in California by the 2010 M w 8.8 Maule-Chile earthquake (Peng et al, 2010), and triggering throughout the United States by the 2011 M w 9.0 Off the Pacific Coast of Tohoku earthquake (Rubinstein et al, 2011). Dynamic triggering of remote events is no longer controversial.…”
Recently, there have been numerous great (M w ≥ 8), devastating earthquakes, with a rate in the last seven years that is 260% of the average rate during the 111-year seismological history. Each great earthquake presents an opportunity to study a major fault at the very beginning and end of the inferred seismic cycle. In this work, we use these events as both targets and sources to probe susceptibility to dynamic triggering in the epicentral region before and after a large earthquake. This study also carefully addresses the possibility that large earthquakes interact in a cascade of remotely triggered sequences that culminates in further large earthquakes. We seek evidence of triggering associated with the 16 great M w ≥ 8 events that occurred between 1998 and 2011, using regional and global earthquake catalogs to measure changes in interevent time statistics. Statistical significance is calculated with respect to a nonstationary reference model that includes mainshock-aftershock clustering. We find limited evidence that a few great earthquakes triggered an increase in seismicity at the site of the next great earthquake in the sequence. However, this evidence is not corroborated by all statistical tests nor all earthquake catalogs. Systematic triggered rate changes in the years to decades before each great earthquake are less than 19% at the 95% confidence level, too small to explain the observed rate increase. The catalogs are insufficient for the purpose of resolving more moderate triggering expected from previous studies. We calculate that an improvement in completeness magnitude from 3.7 to 3.5 could resolve the expected triggering signal in the International Seismic Center (ISC) catalog taken as a whole, but an improvement to M 2.0 would be needed to consistently resolve triggering on a regional basis.
“…Dynamic earthquake triggering, where earthquakes are set off by transient perturbations such as tides or passing seismic waves from other distant earthquakes, is a robustly observed phenomenon [ Brodsky et al ., ; Brodsky and Prejean , ; Cochran et al ., ; Fischer et al ., ; Gomberg and Davis , ; Gomberg and Johnson , ; Gomberg et al ., ; Hill and Prejean , ; Hill et al ., ; Husker and Brodsky , ; Métivier et al ., ; Peng et al ., ; Pollitz et al ., ; Prejean et al ., ; Rubinstein et al ., ; van der Elst and Brodsky , ; Velasco et al ., ; Wu et al ., ]. Earthquake triggering is more prevalent in certain regions, such as volcanic and geothermal areas, but is demonstrably a global phenomenon [ Velasco et al ., ].…”
Earthquake triggering by transient stresses is commonly observed; however, some aspects remain unexplained. The first is the often-observed delay between the triggered earthquakes and the triggering waves, and the second is the unexpected effectiveness of transient stressing in the seismic frequency band. Previous theoretical and laboratory studies have suggested that seismic transients should have little impact on faults if the duration of the transient is smaller than the timescale for nucleation of slip. We reexamine the dynamics of stress triggering during stick-slip sliding on a laboratory fault and make three important observations that pertain to earthquake triggering. (1) Delayed triggering (clock advance) occurs for both bare granite surfaces and granular gouge prior to the onset of instantaneous triggering. (2) Triggering occurs much earlier in the stick-slip cycle than expected for a simple Coulomb stress threshold. (3) Shorter-period (higher stressing rate) pulses are more effective at triggering than longer-period pulses of the same stress amplitude. We use numerical simulations to show that rate-state friction can explain each of the observed features but not all three simultaneously. Only the Ruina slip law for state evolution, in which faults must slip to heal, can reproduce early-onset and stressing rate-dependent triggering. The laboratory and numerical experiments show that faults can remain relatively weak over much of the seismic cycle and that the triggered response depends on a competition between healing and weakening during triggered slip. Transient stressing at seismic frequencies may be more effective at triggering earthquakes than previously recognized.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.