2013
DOI: 10.1007/s11276-013-0672-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamic traffic-aware routing algorithm for multi-sink wireless sensor networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the presented architecture of the network is not complicated enough to support routing graphs. Multiple sinks are generally used in the distributed scenario to balance the traffic load, which is responsible for packet collection as a substation [30,31,32,33]. In this paper, we realize a multi-sink gateway to achieve a highly schedulable WSAN in a practical industrial application.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the presented architecture of the network is not complicated enough to support routing graphs. Multiple sinks are generally used in the distributed scenario to balance the traffic load, which is responsible for packet collection as a substation [30,31,32,33]. In this paper, we realize a multi-sink gateway to achieve a highly schedulable WSAN in a practical industrial application.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If its drawbacks, such as the blindness during scattering packets and the restrictions on coordinate systems, can be properly overcome, a more effective and practicable congestion control mechanism would be achieved for WSNs. Based on this understanding, many studies have been conducted with the aim of using gradient search to solve the routing problem in WSNs [17][18][19][20][21].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In several previous studies in the cost model, only the queue length of nodes has been used to find the next forwarder [19,20]. However, with this limited local information, packets cannot avoid the heavily congested regions.…”
Section: Traffic-balancing Routing Cost Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The routing protocols presented in [3], [5], [15], [16], [17] construct and maintain a best data forwarding path towards all sinks. This is done assuming an application selects the sink, hence a routing protocol does not select the sink node for a data packet (in general, this is the only difference compared to gradientbased best sink selection category).…”
Section: E Frequency Of Dio Messagesmentioning
confidence: 99%