2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.isatra.2018.02.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamic surface fault tolerant control for underwater remotely operated vehicles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Equation (1) defines a linear transformation B from the true control space R 3 to the virtual control space R 2 , which maps (projects) the constrained control subset (unit 3D cube) Ω into attainable command set Φ v ⊂ Φ ( Figure 6). In the general case, the optimal true control input is given by the solution to a two-step optimisation problem [9]:…”
Section: Geometric Insight Into Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Equation (1) defines a linear transformation B from the true control space R 3 to the virtual control space R 2 , which maps (projects) the constrained control subset (unit 3D cube) Ω into attainable command set Φ v ⊂ Φ ( Figure 6). In the general case, the optimal true control input is given by the solution to a two-step optimisation problem [9]:…”
Section: Geometric Insight Into Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A control allocation method for compensation for the effect of thrusters' dead zones is proposed in [8]. The Dynamic Surface Control (DSC) method for underwater ROVs has been proposed in [9]. Exhaustive simulations have been carried out to compare the performance of the DSC method with respect to different control techniques (PID, backstepping and sliding mode approaches) in fault-free and faulty conditions, with included non-linear effects, such as saturation, actuator dynamics, sensor noises etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5 They use fault tolerant control technology to change the structure of the AUV’s propulsion to compensate the loss effectiveness of the fault thruster and make the AUV be able to continue to work with performance as good as the thruster with no fault as possible. 6,7 In fact, the thruster fault does not disappear. The effect of thruster fault is just hidden.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In order to identify thruster failures, Fagogenis, et al [9] proposed an algorithm using a mixture of Gaussians and variational Bayes approximations in the diagnosis process, while [10] applied an online Bayesian nonparametric topic modeling technique to characterize the AUV's performance patterns automatically, then realized fault detection and diagnosis by means of a nearest-neighbor classifier. Reference [11] utilized a second-order sliding mode observer to estimate both the unmeasured system states and the fault extent related to the thrusters of a remotely operated vehicle. In [12], fault diagnosis of the actuators under winding faults was addressed by finite impulse response and principal component analysis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%