2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.ssci.2020.104877
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamic study of critical factors of explosion accident in laboratory based on FTA

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
20
0
4

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
1
20
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…From a statistical perspective, improper storage and handling comprised the most frequent human cause for laboratory incidents (27%), followed by procedure violations (7%) [2]; these two human factors can be considered as aspects of "Operation skills" in the present study. Lack of professional knowledge and not receiving professional training were recognized as the most important events in the laboratory explosion accidents by using FTA [17], which consistent with the results in the present study. In a smaller survey on 85 respondents, the results showed that 9% did not know how to handle an emergency in the laboratory fire and explosion accidents [44], which indicates that emergency ability is also a crucial factor in improving laboratory safety.…”
Section: Comparison With Other Similar Studiessupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…From a statistical perspective, improper storage and handling comprised the most frequent human cause for laboratory incidents (27%), followed by procedure violations (7%) [2]; these two human factors can be considered as aspects of "Operation skills" in the present study. Lack of professional knowledge and not receiving professional training were recognized as the most important events in the laboratory explosion accidents by using FTA [17], which consistent with the results in the present study. In a smaller survey on 85 respondents, the results showed that 9% did not know how to handle an emergency in the laboratory fire and explosion accidents [44], which indicates that emergency ability is also a crucial factor in improving laboratory safety.…”
Section: Comparison With Other Similar Studiessupporting
confidence: 91%
“…HAZOP (hazard and operability analysis) is the common and original method of lab safety management, which can help to allocate the measures according to the relative importance of risks [ 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 ]. Additionally, FMEA (failure mode effect and criticality analysis) [ 12 , 13 ], FTA (fault tree analysis) [ 14 , 15 ], ETA (event tree analysis) [ 16 , 17 ] and Bayesian networks (BNs) [ 3 , 13 ] have also been introduced into laboratory risk assessments. These various methods provide more options for risk identification from different perspectives [ 18 , 19 , 20 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When the last domino falls, it will cause damage. On this basis, linear models such as failure mode and effect analysis (FMEA) [ 24 ], Fault Tree Analysis (FTA) [ 25 , 26 ], and Event Tree Analysis (ETA) [ 27 , 28 ] were developed. However, these models are effective in analyzing the simple accidents caused by a single factor, but it is not suitable to explain accidents involving the interaction of multiple risk factors in complex systems, like HCRTS.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…FT quantitative analysis is to calculate the occurrence probability of the TE if all the failure probabilities of the BEs are available. The FTA method is based on Boolean logic [54], and the calculation of FT uses Boolean mathematics [55]. An FT can be modeled by a set of AND gates and OR gates connected between BEs and IEs.…”
Section: The Quantitative Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%