2021
DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18126545
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Methodology for Dynamic Assessment of Laboratory Safety by SEM-SD

Abstract: Lab safety problems have become an impeding factor that cannot be ignored in normal teaching and scientific research activities at colleges and universities. As the risk factors of lab accidents can be conceptualized as occurring at multiple levels, systematically improving and optimizing lab safety is the crucial route to accident prevention in labs. In this paper, a novel method that integrates a structural equation model (SEM) and system dynamics (SD) is presented to dynamically assess lab safety with the c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The contribution rate ( ) was defined in this study to measure the sensitivity of each risk factor to the level of unsafe behavior of miners. The value is calculated as follows [ 65 ]: …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The contribution rate ( ) was defined in this study to measure the sensitivity of each risk factor to the level of unsafe behavior of miners. The value is calculated as follows [ 65 ]: …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, we needed to normalize the coefficients of system dynamics equation in the simulation model; the results are shown in Table 2 [ 27 ].…”
Section: Simulating and Results Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…System dynamics is based on feedback loops; therefore, it is insensitive to most non-critical parameters in the model. As long as the parameter estimation is within a reasonable range, there will be little or no deviation in the model results [ 27 ]. Therefore, the influence of the error term σ i ( i = 1, 2, … n ) was not considered in this study, and its value was set to 0, the same as below.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To convert qualitative linguistic expressions to corresponding fuzzy numbers, Chen and Hwang established a relationship between qualitative terms and their corresponding fuzzy numbers in different scales [ 56 ], which enables the transformation of subjective judgements and linguistic expressions into measurable and numerical data. As to the number of verbal expressions, five verb expressions are preferred when an expert makes a suitable judgement [ 57 ]. Hence, in the present study, TrFN was employed to calculate the weight of the likelihood and consequence of the risk factors, which were identified from accident data.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%