Dynamic risk assessment approach of riser recoil control failure during production test of marine natural gas hydrate

Abstract

The marine natural gas hydrate is considered to have huge resource potential in the South China Sea, and a sixty‐day production test has been successfully conducted in 2017. As the crucial and most vulnerable connection of floating platform and subsea wellhead, the risers are of paramount importance in safe production test of the hydrate. Due to harsh environment and the possible drive off and drift off events induced by failure of dynamic positioning system of the platform, the unplanned emergency disconnect of risers is an integral preventive measure to avoid accidents and secure the well. Once the disconnect occurs, the huge potential energy stored in the riser column will release and consequently cause violent axial recoil, which will cause serious consequences if the recoil control fails. This paper presented a quantitative risk assessment approach on the basis of dynamic Bayesian networks to dynamically predict the risk of riser recoil control failure during production test of hydrate. By using the proposed method, the dynamic failure risk of the riser recoil control was figured out, and the most contributory factors were identified. The practical application of the proposed methodology was demonstrated through a case study. Results indicated that the probability of riser recoil control failure can be significantly decreased within one year through equipment repair, and the failure and repair rates of shutoff valves and main air isolation valves are the most contributory factors. Some corresponding safety control measures were proposed to further mitigate the risk of riser recoil control failure during the production test of hydrate.

Numerical simulation of the stress field and fault sealing of complex fault combinations in Changning area, Southern Sichuan Basin, China

“…In contrast, when a section is in a tensile stress environment, the sealing performance of the section is poor, and a fault opens, becoming a channel for oil and gas escape. [21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29] In the quantitative evaluation of fault sealing, obtaining the stress value on the fault plane is the key to solving the problem. At present, the most intuitive and accurate method to obtain the stress value is to measure the crustal stress by field hydraulic fracturing tests, but this method is restricted by the location and number of well points, and the measured in situ stress is not the normal stress on the fault plane.…”