2019
DOI: 10.1007/s40870-019-00210-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamic Response of Advanced Materials Impacted by Particle Beams: The MultiMat Experiment

Abstract: The introduction at CERN of new extremely energetic particle accelerators, such as the high-luminosity large hadron collider (HL-LHC) or the proposed future circular collider (FCC), will increase the energy stored in the circulating particle beams by almost a factor of two (from 360 to 680 MJ) and of more than 20 (up to 8500 MJ), respectively. In this scenario, it is paramount to assess the dynamic thermomechanical response of materials presently used, or being developed for future use, in beam intercepting de… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
(29 reference statements)
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…e material is assumed to be isotropic in nature, based on previous study of the material [6], and is assumed to behave in an elasto-plastic manner based on the fourpoint bending test presented in this study. Similar analyses have been performed on other materials tested in the MultiMat experiment, and information on the thermomechanical modelling aspects in such scenarios is detailed in previous studies [13,15]. Similarly, analytical solutions for the dynamic response of slender beams subjected to thermal shock have also been studied extensively [34][35][36][37][38][39].…”
Section: Modelling and Benchmarking With Experimental Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…e material is assumed to be isotropic in nature, based on previous study of the material [6], and is assumed to behave in an elasto-plastic manner based on the fourpoint bending test presented in this study. Similar analyses have been performed on other materials tested in the MultiMat experiment, and information on the thermomechanical modelling aspects in such scenarios is detailed in previous studies [13,15]. Similarly, analytical solutions for the dynamic response of slender beams subjected to thermal shock have also been studied extensively [34][35][36][37][38][39].…”
Section: Modelling and Benchmarking With Experimental Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tested specimens were equipped with thermal probes and strain gauges and placed on graphitic supports. Other materials tested in the MultiMat experiment included heavy alloys such as titanium zirconium molybdenum, Inermet180 and tantalum tungsten, carbide-graphite composites, silicon carbide, and carbon foams [13][14][15][16].…”
Section: Copper Diamondmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The facility originated from the LHC Collimation Project [4] where there was a need to test accelerator equipment under beam shock impacts using equivalent LHC type beam conditions. Hi-RadMat was designed for these R&D purposes and has successfully completed several experiments in this category [5][6][7][8][9]. However, the facility has also developed into a world renowned high energy testing facility with users from many global institutes performing experiments outside its design remit including tests on superconducting magnetic components [10], developments of beam monitoring equipment [11,12] and validation of numerical simulations hypothesising the effects of high energy beam pulses [13].…”
Section: Hiradmat Facility Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Apart from low resistivity, the coating material must show good adhesion to the bulk substrate and have a large melting point to prevent damage against beam losses. In order to verify the coating robustness, different graphitic materials coated with metallic thin films have been tested in the CERN HiRadMat facility [20] with proton beams. Among the proposed metallic thin films, the molybdenum coating shows the least extended beam damage, mainly due to its higher melting temperature.…”
Section: Considered Materials Choices For Collimationmentioning
confidence: 99%