1980
DOI: 10.2355/tetsutohagane1955.66.12_1659
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamic Recrystallization of Austenite in 18-8 Stainless Steel and 18 Ni Maraging Steel and Its Related Phenomena

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
9
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
2
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(1) from elevated temperature tensile tests for 18Ni maraging steel and 188 stainless steel respectively. 10) Obtained exponent n def in this study is similar to those although they are not given from same material. In various kinds of pure metal and alloy, larger value compared to selfdiffusion energy or volume diffusion of alloying element is obtained in case that dynamic recrystallization is dominant mechanism of dynamic restoration.…”
Section: Deformation Behaviorsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…(1) from elevated temperature tensile tests for 18Ni maraging steel and 188 stainless steel respectively. 10) Obtained exponent n def in this study is similar to those although they are not given from same material. In various kinds of pure metal and alloy, larger value compared to selfdiffusion energy or volume diffusion of alloying element is obtained in case that dynamic recrystallization is dominant mechanism of dynamic restoration.…”
Section: Deformation Behaviorsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…Metallographic examination revealed that dynamic recrystallisation started at a fraction of approximately 0.8 of the peak strain, originated by local bulging of grain boundaries. A similar study was performed by Maki and colleagues [36,37]. These authors analyzed the DRX behavior of austenite in an 18-8 stainless steel and an 18 Ni maraging steel by microstructural observations of the water-quenched specimens deformed under tensile deformation, applying different strain rates and temperatures, ranging from 1073 K (800 • C) to 1473 K (1200 • C) and from 1.0 × 10 −3 to 1.0 × 10 −1 s −1 , respectively.…”
Section: Metallographic Determinationsupporting
confidence: 55%
“…As temperature could be controlled precisely using proposed heating and rolling equipment, it could be helpful to realize precise control of microstructure of stainless steel. [7][8][9][10] Microstructure control of austenitic stainless steel is really important because SUS304 steel does not exhibit microstructure change due to phase transformation.…”
Section: Change In Microstructure After Continuous Heat-mentioning
confidence: 99%