2018
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3224532
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamic Recruitment of Single RNAs to Processing Bodies Depends on RNA Functionality

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
29
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In a previous study (Pitchiaya et al, 2019), we observed that osmotic stress leads to phase separation of DCP1A, a non-catalytic protein component of the eukaryotic decapping complex and conserved PB marker (Anderson and Kedersha, 2009). To study the intracellular kinetics of de novo PB and SG formation in response to stress more broadly, we subjected U2OS cells to osmotic and oxidative stressors, and performed fixed-cell protein immunofluorescence (IF) or combined IF and RNA fluorescent in situ hybridization (RNA-FISH) before and after the stressors (Figure 1).…”
Section: Changes In Extracellular Tonicity Induce Rapid and Reversible Intracellular Phase Separation Of Dcp1a But Not Sg Markersmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…In a previous study (Pitchiaya et al, 2019), we observed that osmotic stress leads to phase separation of DCP1A, a non-catalytic protein component of the eukaryotic decapping complex and conserved PB marker (Anderson and Kedersha, 2009). To study the intracellular kinetics of de novo PB and SG formation in response to stress more broadly, we subjected U2OS cells to osmotic and oxidative stressors, and performed fixed-cell protein immunofluorescence (IF) or combined IF and RNA fluorescent in situ hybridization (RNA-FISH) before and after the stressors (Figure 1).…”
Section: Changes In Extracellular Tonicity Induce Rapid and Reversible Intracellular Phase Separation Of Dcp1a But Not Sg Markersmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Supporting different outcomes upon miRISC binding to coding and noncoding transcripts is recent evidence that these two classes of transcripts have distinct interaction dynamics with processing bodies (PB; Pitchiaya et al , 2019), the subcellular compartment where miRNA‐dependent destabilization is thought to occur (Eulalio et al , 2007). Specifically, and in contrast to miRNA‐bound mRNAs, which localize to the core of PB, miRNA‐bound lncRNAs interact transiently and tend to locate to the PB periphery, a pattern that might reflect missing interactions with other molecular factors involved in miRNA‐dependent regulation (Pitchiaya et al , 2019). One such factor could be DDX6, a PB‐localized dead box helicase that links miRNA‐dependent translation inhibition and decay (Chu & Rana, 2006; Chen et al , 2014; Rouya et al , 2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Early work in P‐bodies provided evidence that these structures could act as sites of mRNA decay (Parker & Sheth, 2007; Sheth & Parker, 2003), and smaller P‐bodies appear to be suited to stimulating mRNA decay whereas larger P‐bodies may be better for storage (Pitchiaya et al, 2019). More recent work in P‐bodies and stress granules suggests that these structures can also act as storage sites for mRNAs upon cellular stress (Hubstenberger et al, 2017; Ivanov, Kedersha, & Anderson, 2019; Padron, Iwasaki, & Ingolia, 2019; Protter & Parker, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%