2017
DOI: 10.3390/e19040170
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamic Rankings for Seed Selection in Complex Networks: Balancing Costs and Coverage

Abstract: Information spreading processes within the complex networks are usually initiated by a selection of highly influential nodes in accordance with the used seeding strategy. The majority of earlier studies assumed the usage of selected seeds at the beginning of the process. Our previous research revealed the advantage of using a sequence of seeds instead of a single stage approach. The current study extends sequential seeding and further improves results with the use of dynamic rankings, which are created by reca… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The presented results lay firm foundation for the earlier studies related to sequential seeding and address currently unanswered research questions [21][22][23]. Averaging the coverage obtained by the typical agent based simulations delivers improvement in about 90% of the cases [21], the formal proof relying on the coordinated execution and corroborated by the new empirical studies shows that sequential seeding delivers at least as large coverage as the widely used single stage seeding; under modest assumption this coverage is provably larger.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 73%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The presented results lay firm foundation for the earlier studies related to sequential seeding and address currently unanswered research questions [21][22][23]. Averaging the coverage obtained by the typical agent based simulations delivers improvement in about 90% of the cases [21], the formal proof relying on the coordinated execution and corroborated by the new empirical studies shows that sequential seeding delivers at least as large coverage as the widely used single stage seeding; under modest assumption this coverage is provably larger.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…It takes the advantage of delayed seeding by interweaving activating seeds with diffusion. Here we firm the foundations of sequential seeding and address a number of research questions that have not been studied before [21][22][23]. First, we prove formally and confirm experimentally on real networks that the sequential seeding is at least as good as the single stage method and under modest conditions, it is provably better.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…These types of solutions are based more on better use of processes of natural diffusion and use sequential seeding [27], avoid nodes from within the same communities with intra connections that are close by using target communities [28], use dynamic rankings with sequential seeding [29] and use mechanisms for voting that have lower weights once activated nodes have been detected [30]. Apart from basic centrality measures, the central nodes in networks can be detected using a k-shell based approach [31].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sequential seeding was further extended towards the recalculation of rankings with effective degree used in each seeding stage [36]. In another study, the ability of buffering not used seeds was analysed with seeds collected in buffer during no seeding stages.…”
Section: Sequential Seeding For Temporal Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%