2020
DOI: 10.1017/nws.2020.24
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamic network prediction

Abstract: Abstract We present a statistical framework for generating predicted dynamic networks based on the observed evolution of social relationships in a population. The framework includes a novel and flexible procedure to sample dynamic networks given a probability distribution on evolving network properties; it permits the use of a broad class of approaches to model trends, seasonal variability, uncertainty, and changes in population composition. Current methods do not account fo… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, the CCM framework has already been expanded to dynamic networks. 65 In addition to addressing the complexities in the PIRC data, there is a need to develop statistical methods in several areas. The first is assessing MCMC algorithms when modeling a large number of network model parameters, which is possible for CCMs and demonstrated in our simulation studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Furthermore, the CCM framework has already been expanded to dynamic networks. 65 In addition to addressing the complexities in the PIRC data, there is a need to develop statistical methods in several areas. The first is assessing MCMC algorithms when modeling a large number of network model parameters, which is possible for CCMs and demonstrated in our simulation studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, one advantage of the CCM framework is that known biases in selection can be incorporated directly in the formulation of π0false(θfalse)$$ {\pi}_0\left(\theta \right) $$. Furthermore, the CCM framework has already been expanded to dynamic networks 65 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, there are computational limits to the size of networks that can be analyzed using BERGMs. A potential future direction is investigating complex features using the PLOS ONE congruence class model (CCM) for networks [30][31][32][33][34]. CCMs form a broad class that includes as special cases such common network models as the Erdős-Re ´nyi-Gilbert and stochastic block models as well as many ERGMs.…”
Section: Plos Onementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, they note that implementing procedures for approximating a solution to the likelihood is more challenging for larger datasets 26 . Even if these computational issues can be addressed, ERGMs are nonetheless severely limited in the types of generative mechanisms that can be modeled 27 . The primary contribution of our approach is to develop a Bayesian model selection approach for networks that broadens the range of potential mechanisms whose role in generating an observed network can be investigated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%