2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2014.05.028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamic multidimensional modelling of submerged membrane bioreactor fouling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 6 demonstrates no observable increase in TMP over time, indicating that membrane fouling is sustainable and below critical flux. Gas sparging provides surface shear and therefore controls particle deposition [22]. At Site A, there were two notable exceptions with fouling events on Day 30 and Day 170, these fouling events were represented by a rapid increase in TMP ( Figure 6) and coincided with failure of the biogas recirculation pump and in both occurrences, the gas sparging rate reduced from 35 L.min -1 to approximately 10 L.min -1 .…”
Section: Membrane Performance and Foulingmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Figure 6 demonstrates no observable increase in TMP over time, indicating that membrane fouling is sustainable and below critical flux. Gas sparging provides surface shear and therefore controls particle deposition [22]. At Site A, there were two notable exceptions with fouling events on Day 30 and Day 170, these fouling events were represented by a rapid increase in TMP ( Figure 6) and coincided with failure of the biogas recirculation pump and in both occurrences, the gas sparging rate reduced from 35 L.min -1 to approximately 10 L.min -1 .…”
Section: Membrane Performance and Foulingmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The accumulation of particulates in the AnMBR vessel can increase membrane fouling due to cake accumulation [22]. Membrane fouling rate, and the ability to operate at an effective critical flux (the flux below at which the system can be operated without periodic cake dispersal) is the primary factor influencing economic feasibility of membrane processes [23], with membrane costs in the range of 72% of capital investment [24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fouling, which results in decreased hydraulic performance, has limited the widespread application of membrane technology [23,61]. Membrane fouling is a complex problem that is affected by a range of factors, including operational conditions, influent characteristics, membrane and biomass properties and their mutual combination [10,12,62,63]. As a result, a wide range of issues related to membrane fouling have been the subject of intensive study.…”
Section: Disadvantages and Limitations Of Anmbrmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The non-Newtonian nature of activated sludge flows [38] is not considered in these cases. The works [13], [17], and [39] should be mentioned as exceptions as they simulate two-phase flows in SMBRs with mixed liquor as a non-Newtonian fluid, using a Bingham [13] and Ostwald-de Waele/power law equation [17,39]. Following this trend, rheological tests were carried out to determine the best model available in Fluent that matched the mixed-liquor behavior and the parameters required as input for this model.…”
Section: Simulation Of Mixed-liquor Behaviormentioning
confidence: 99%