Impact of Aeration on Mixed Liquor in Submerged‐Membrane Bioreactors for Wastewater Treatment

Abstract

In submerged-membrane bioreactors (SMBRs) for wastewater treatment, aeration with coarse bubbles is applied to limit fouling. The understanding of the different mechanisms between aeration and fouling helps to manage the aeration policy. The impact of aeration (macro scale) on shear stress and mixed-liquor properties (local scale) is evaluated. Experimental characterization of gas-liquid flow in membrane modules, computational fluid dynamics simulation, and controlled breakdown of SMBR mixed-liquor samples are reported. Mean bubble velocities were significantly lower in mixed liquor than in water and the shear stress was one order of magnitude higher in mixed liquor than in water. The floc size decreased and soluble protein concentrations increased with higher shear stress values. Considering the known impacts of these mixed-liquor properties on fouling, the obtained local results explain stronger fouling when coarse bubble aeration increases.

Limitation du colmatage dans un bioréacteur à membranes à l’échelle semi-industrielle : modélisation et caractérisation de l’hydrodynamique

“…Des travaux de recherche récents se sont focalisés sur l'optimisation de l'aération des membranes, et plus particulièrement sur la caractérisation de l'hydrodynamique au sein de ces réacteurs [BRAAK et al, 2017].…”

A novel design of in‐line static mixer for permanganate/bisulfite process: Numerical simulations and pilot‐scale testing

“…), the designing process which incorporates modeling and numerical simulation becomes much easier and thus saves researchers and engineers much time and cost of field experiments. Specifically, FLUENT, as a typical general purpose computational fluid dynamics (CFD) code, has been frequently applied by CAE engineers in the field of water treatment, because hydrodynamic lays a solid foundation for the design, evaluation, and optimization for structures (Balan et al, 2019; Braak et al, 2017; Ding et al, 2013; Fan et al, 2007; Jensen et al, 2006) and equipment (Ibrahim et al, 2013; O'Doherty et al, 2009) for a long time (Bush & Silveston, 1978; Glover et al, 2006; Jiang et al, 2014; Peng et al, 2014). Recently, with the development of energy and dissipation models, the performance of FLUENT solver in simulating the mixing process within in‐line static mixers has been validated by a large number of published papers (Hobbs & Muzzio, 1997; Byrde & Sawley, 1999; Cheng et al, 2016; Haddadi et al, 2020; Hobbs et al, 1998; Hobbs, Muzzio, 1998a, 1998b; Ir & Lecjaks, 2011; Kumar et al, 2008; Lang et al, 1995; Rahmani et al, 2007; Rauline et al, 2000).…”

Electrical resistivity tomography used to characterize bubble distribution in complex aerated reactors: Development of the method and application to a semi-industrial MBR in operation

“…On the other hand, the impact of rheology on bubble size, shape and preferential flow path have been reported [4,11] and should not be neglected. Braak et al [12] compared hydrodynamics between air/water and air/mixed liquor flows. They found velocities lower in the activated sludge than in the water for the air flow rates tested and shear stresses were one order of magnitude higher in activated sludge than in water.…”