2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2015.02.031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamic mechanical analysis and thermal properties of LLDPE/EVA/modified silica nanocomposites

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
(30 reference statements)
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As shown in Figure A, it is found that the fuel cell performance of composite membranes exhibited slightly better than pristine SPAEK membrane. The open circuit voltage (OCV) of all fabricated MEAs showed above 0.92 V, indicating that the as‐synthesized membranes had good fuel (H 2 ) permeation resistance . The maximum power densities of SPAEK, SPAEK/SiO 2 , SPAEK/ƒ‐SiO 2 , and Nafion 115 membranes were approximately 296.75, 339.96, 445.34, and 295.99 mW cm −2 under 100% RH, respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…As shown in Figure A, it is found that the fuel cell performance of composite membranes exhibited slightly better than pristine SPAEK membrane. The open circuit voltage (OCV) of all fabricated MEAs showed above 0.92 V, indicating that the as‐synthesized membranes had good fuel (H 2 ) permeation resistance . The maximum power densities of SPAEK, SPAEK/SiO 2 , SPAEK/ƒ‐SiO 2 , and Nafion 115 membranes were approximately 296.75, 339.96, 445.34, and 295.99 mW cm −2 under 100% RH, respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Mechanical testing is one of the most sensitive measuring techniques for thermal analysis. The temperature dependence of the modulus and mechanical loss of the composites also provides significant information on the end‐use performance of the composites tested and can easily be applied to predict control process behavior . Figure shows the change of the storage modulus with temperature for LGFTP composites at several different scanning frequencies.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is due to good distribution of HNTs throughout the PP matrix as well as good interfacial bonding between polymer and filler. 35 It could be observed from Figure 6 that there is a substantial raise in the T g with the addition of surface-modified HNTs doped polymer composites than pure PP. The T g for pure PP was at 6.8°C, whereas T g with the incorporation of surface-modified HNTs of 6 wt% and 8 wt% were at 7.2°C and 8.3°C, respectively.…”
Section: Dma Analysismentioning
confidence: 89%