2018
DOI: 10.3762/bjoc.14.195
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamic light scattering studies of the effects of salts on the diffusivity of cationic and anionic cavitands

Abstract: Although alkali halide salts play key roles in all living systems, the physical models used to describe the properties of aqueous solutions of salts do not take into account specific ion–ion interactions. To identify specific ion–ion interactions possibly contributing to the aggregation of proteins, we have used dynamic light scattering (DLS) to probe the aggregation of charged cavitands. DLS measurements of negatively charged 1 in the presence of a range of alkali metal halides reveal no significant aggregati… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This free energy difference corresponds to a p K a shift between the capsules of 3.0, which again is in reasonable agreement with those reported (Figure ). Overall, these agreements are excellent given the inherent assumptions made in this simple model, not the least of which is the neglect of ion-specific binding to the outside of the two capsules. , Furthermore, the model confirms–at least for the two host discussed here–the primary role of Coulombic forces in promoting cyclizations within the capsules. That stated, a potential cautionary note here is that the modeling does not reveal any significant difference in the internal EP field that may explain the differences in stabilization of the thiolate and TS.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 58%
“…This free energy difference corresponds to a p K a shift between the capsules of 3.0, which again is in reasonable agreement with those reported (Figure ). Overall, these agreements are excellent given the inherent assumptions made in this simple model, not the least of which is the neglect of ion-specific binding to the outside of the two capsules. , Furthermore, the model confirms–at least for the two host discussed here–the primary role of Coulombic forces in promoting cyclizations within the capsules. That stated, a potential cautionary note here is that the modeling does not reveal any significant difference in the internal EP field that may explain the differences in stabilization of the thiolate and TS.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 58%
“…Regarding ion association, we have previously demonstrated both specific ion binding to the crown of four ammonium groups defined by the pendent groups in 1 , 60 as well as nonspecific association (ion condensation) to the host and its dimer capsule. 41 , 61 In contrast, there are no specific cation binding sites in 2 or its capsule; only weak ion condensation has been observed. 41 , 62 Irrespective of the type of binding, increases in the ionic strength and/or swapping the capsule counterions by the addition of ions with higher cavitand affinity lead to a reduction in its EPF.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The effective charge of the two host capsules is less than their formal ±16 because of attenuation from associating counterions, and charge transfer to the solvation shell waters. Regarding ion association, we have previously demonstrated both specific ion binding to the crown of four ammonium groups defined by the pendent groups in 1 , as well as nonspecific association (ion condensation) to the host and its dimer capsule. , In contrast, there are no specific cation binding sites in 2 or its capsule; only weak ion condensation has been observed. , Irrespective of the type of binding, increases in the ionic strength and/or swapping the capsule counterions by the addition of ions with higher cavitand affinity lead to a reduction in its EPF. In the case of the capsules, this can induce a change in the nature of an assembly or modulate the chemical reactivity of an internalized guest …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Dynamic light scattering (DLS), NMR spectroscopy, and dark-field microscope are very useful tools for studying the Hofmeister effect. [12,13,16,[28][29][30] DLS technique mainly depends on the Brownian motion of particles. It can provide quite quantita-tive information such as hydrodynamic diameters for studying the Hofmeister effect.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%