2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.cis.2016.12.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamic interfacial tension of surfactant solutions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
64
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 103 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 112 publications
1
64
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The conventional technique of determining the surfactants adsorption has been studied by computer simulation, mathematical and kinetic analysis as such [10][11][12]. None of these techniques, however, provide sufficient understanding in visualizing the adsorption of surfactants on carbon nanotubes at the molecular level.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The conventional technique of determining the surfactants adsorption has been studied by computer simulation, mathematical and kinetic analysis as such [10][11][12]. None of these techniques, however, provide sufficient understanding in visualizing the adsorption of surfactants on carbon nanotubes at the molecular level.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the interface between the solution and air saturated by hexane, however, the surface tensions dropped down by 18–22 mN m −1 to become 40.7 and 30.6 mN m −1 , respectively, for these two solutions. In addition, in [109] the temperature dependence of the adsorption and desorption dynamics of heptane vapor at the drop surface of C 10 EO 8 solution was studied.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While dynamic surface tension data and sorption model parameters for aqueous systems are available for a large number of surfactants [25,43], only limited data for other solvents are available. Future works should therefore investigate sorption dynamics of non-aqueous systems, such as, e.g., energy curable inks used in a wide range of inkjet applications [32].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%