2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.jnucmat.2007.01.141
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamic interaction between disruptive plasma and wall in the small tokamak HYBTOK-II

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
(1 reference statement)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Zero in time corresponds to the initiating time of CQ. Disruption was driven by ramping up I p to reduce the plasma surface safety factor q a (= aB t /RB θ ), where B t and B θ are the toroidal and poloidal magnetic field strengths, respectively [14,15]. The typical parameters just before CQ are as follows: plasma minor radius is approximately 9.5 ∼ 10.5 cm, q a ∼ 3, I p = 10-11 kA, and B t ∼ 0.25 T. It is found that the waveform of CQ consists of two phases of slow and fast current decays in the HYBTOK-II disruptions as shown in Fig.…”
Section: Waveform Of Disruptive Discharge In Hybtok-ii Tokamakmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Zero in time corresponds to the initiating time of CQ. Disruption was driven by ramping up I p to reduce the plasma surface safety factor q a (= aB t /RB θ ), where B t and B θ are the toroidal and poloidal magnetic field strengths, respectively [14,15]. The typical parameters just before CQ are as follows: plasma minor radius is approximately 9.5 ∼ 10.5 cm, q a ∼ 3, I p = 10-11 kA, and B t ∼ 0.25 T. It is found that the waveform of CQ consists of two phases of slow and fast current decays in the HYBTOK-II disruptions as shown in Fig.…”
Section: Waveform Of Disruptive Discharge In Hybtok-ii Tokamakmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 10 shows the temporal evolution of electron density and pressure at the edge, which is obtained by averaging over the area between r = 5.5 cm and 10 cm, at around the current quench. After the pump-out of plasma particle, n e at the edge region increases because hydrogen recycling is enhanced due to an increase in the interaction between the plasma and the wall [13]. The area averaged electron pressure becomes maximum just after current quench starting time.…”
Section: Growth Of Tearing Modementioning
confidence: 99%
“…No theoretical explanation has been published so far, only few work has been reported in the literature, which are only linked with experimental details, that is, Okamoto et al gives the interaction between plasma disruption and wall in HYBTOK-II tokamak by using triple probe. They observed that wave form of plasma quench has two phases, that is, slow and then fast decay process that influence the rapid movement of plasma to the inner wall as well [9]. • J. Li et al find out the effect of plasma disruption on magnetic system in EAST tokamak and calculates the temperature effect experimentally [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%