2013
DOI: 10.1007/s00603-013-0503-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamic Indirect Tensile Strength of Sandstone Under Different Loading Rates

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
33
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 95 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…e loading process is displacementcontrolled, and the load speed is 0.002 mm/s. e staticdynamic load test is conducted with a modified SHPB testing system, as shown in Figure 1 [14,15]. is system uses halfsine stress wave loading.…”
Section: Testing Equipmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…e loading process is displacementcontrolled, and the load speed is 0.002 mm/s. e staticdynamic load test is conducted with a modified SHPB testing system, as shown in Figure 1 [14,15]. is system uses halfsine stress wave loading.…”
Section: Testing Equipmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In experimental research of rock materials, the direct tensile test is considered the most effective method for determining rock tensile strength [2][3][4][5]. However, due to the difficulty of specimen processing and pure one-dimensional direct tensile loading, the Brazilian disc test was introduced and used widely to determine the indirect tensile strength of rock or rock-like materials [3,4,6,7], which has been accepted by many researchers [8][9][10][11][12][13] or test standards [14][15][16] because of its simplicity and ease of operation. In Brazilian disc tests, three sets of loading methods, including the strip loading method, the circular arc loading method, and the plate loading method, were usually adopted to measure the indirect tensile strength of rock materials [17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this equation represents a specific range of strain rates and for particular materials and so may be not suited to describe the essential features of strain rate dependence for a broad range of strain rates and different materials. Moreover, prominent strength fluctuations have been observed in rock material for the range of strain rates from 10 −3 to 10 −1 s −1 [ Gong and Zhao , ].…”
Section: Results Analysis and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%