2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.111299
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamic increase factors for Radiata pine CLT panels subjected to simulated out-of-plane blast loading

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Shock tubes are the most widely reported experimental technique for generating blast loads on timber structures. Pneumatically driven (Lloyd et al, 2010) and gas-detonation (Phillips et al (2021); Van Le et al (2020)) shock tubes have been used for this purpose, as shown in Figures 2(b) and (c), respectively. The advantage of shock tube testing is that relatively large-scale experiments can be performed in a controlled laboratory environment for the exploration of the fundamental behaviour of structures and validation of analytical models.…”
Section: Experimental Techniques Used To Study Response Of Wood Struc...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Shock tubes are the most widely reported experimental technique for generating blast loads on timber structures. Pneumatically driven (Lloyd et al, 2010) and gas-detonation (Phillips et al (2021); Van Le et al (2020)) shock tubes have been used for this purpose, as shown in Figures 2(b) and (c), respectively. The advantage of shock tube testing is that relatively large-scale experiments can be performed in a controlled laboratory environment for the exploration of the fundamental behaviour of structures and validation of analytical models.…”
Section: Experimental Techniques Used To Study Response Of Wood Struc...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The model was developed considering full bond action between timber layers, which might be over simplistic to accurately predict the complex inter-layer interactions. More recently, Van Le et al(60) developed and validated a FE model of CLT panels against experimental testing, taking into account the anisotropy of each CLT layer. These authors conducted a sensitivity analysis on the the stiffness of the panel and reported that it has a marginal effect on the peak displacement.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Weaver et al [6] performed live-blast testing on full-scale, multi-story CLT buildings and provided evidence for CLT's ability to resist varying levels of explosive loading in a real-world application. Additionally, several researchers have utilized shock tubes to subject CLT flexural specimens to simulated far-field blast loading and provide methods to model CLT's response to blast loading, obtain data on the behavior of commonly used connections in CLT to blast, and obtain data on the performance of retrofits in CLT subjected to blast loading [7][8][9][10][11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dynamic testing to date has primarily focused on the flexural response of CLT specimens subjected to shock, despite the dramatic effects of RS failures. Specifically, blast testing testing has focused on specimens with large span-to-depth ratios (approximately 12 to 35) [6,7,11], specimens with complex boundary conditions [6,8,9], and low strain rates on the order of 10 −1 s −1 [7][8][9][10][11]. A few hypotheses that may explain the absence of shear modes of failure in dynamically loaded CLT include the following: experimental shock tests on CLT have avoided applying sufficient energy to produce a post-yield response in CLT; large span-to-depth ratios (i.e., ≥12) elicit a largely flexural response, whereas lower ratios would elicit greater shear deformation and a mix of flexural and shear failure modes; complex and/or stiff boundary conditions redistribute the stresses induced by shock loading, thereby precluding the initiation of shear failure modes; and material scale shock testing of wood indicates that strain-rate enhancement occurs at intermediate to very high strain rates (10 1 s −1 to 10 5 s −1 ) [12][13][14][15][16], whereas most experiments on CLT to date have focused on far-field blasts and thus low strain rates (≤10 −1 s −1 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%