Dynamic Habitat and Population Analysis: An Approach to Resolve the Biodiversity Manager's Dilemma

Abstract

Biodiversity managers face a dilemma of choosing between ''coarse-filter'' approaches that deal with the habitats of several species and ''fine-filter'' approaches that address population viability of one or a few species. We present an approach for local spatial scales that integrates habitat-based and population-based methods to focus research and management on the species in a community that are most at risk of extinction and on the places in the landscape most important to these species. The steps in Dynamic Habitat and Population (DHP) Analysis are:1) determine which species in the planning area most merit field study based on existing data;2) use local field data to select species that most merit demographic study;3) use demographic data to model population viability of the species deemed most at risk; 4) design and evaluate alternative management strategies for key species and landscape settings.We review each step and provide an example for land birds in a portion of the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem. Among the 143 species of land birds likely in the study area, we selected 13 species most at risk of extinction. These were mostly neotropical migrant passerines that specialized on low-elevation deciduous habitats that may serve as population source areas. We present a management plan for the multiple ownerships of the study area that seeks to maintain/restore population source habitats for key species.DHP Analysis provides a framework for biodiversity management for those regions identified as high priority for conservation by continental-scale assessment programs such as Gap Analysis. Our approach is designed to minimize local extinctions, which should reduce the risk of range-wide extinctions.

Effects of Exurban Development on Biodiversity: Patterns, Mechanisms, and Research Needs

“…There may sometimes also be considerable overlap in impacts among these land use types. A study in south western Montana found that density of cowbirds and parasitism of native bird species were significantly associated with density of homes, area in crops, and livestock densities within 6 km of riparian habitats (Hansen et al 1999). Presumably this results because all three of these land use types provide supplemental foods that attract cowbirds.…”

Order and disorder in the river continuum: the contribution of continuity and connectivity to floodplain meadow biodiversity

“…When the population structures of the species at risk are known, the implications of this work can be used to enhance conservation schemes (Van Treuren et al. , 1993; Hansen et al. , 1999; Selinger‐Looten et al.…”

“…When the population structures of the species at risk are known, the implications of this work can be used to enhance conservation schemes (Van Treuren et al, 1993;Hansen et al, 1999;Selinger-Looten et al, 1999;Pedroli et al, 2002;Brys et al, 2003). The population dynamics strategies, explaining the regional persistence and patterns in populations, can be useful for guiding the delineation of conservation strategies (Miles, 1979;Lowe, 2002;Freckleton & Watkinson, 2003).…”

Spatial Risk Assessment Across Large Landscapes with Varied Land Use: Lessons from a Conservation Assessment of Military Lands

“…( 15,16 ) Such models describe predicted species occurrence (presence or absence) on a site based on known species associations with vegetation types and landforms, and other habitat features such as elevation, museum records, and expert opinion. ( 13,16–18 ) An example, for black‐tailed prairie dog, is shown in Fig. 3.…”