Proceedings of the 7th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems 2013
DOI: 10.1145/2507157.2508069
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamic generation of personalized hybrid recommender systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
12
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
(2 reference statements)
2
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is not necessarily a causal relationship, but may indicate that more active users in the system are more particularly interested in the recommender-switching feature. This finding is consistent with those of Dooms [6].…”
Section: Rq1: Users Switch Algorithmssupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is not necessarily a causal relationship, but may indicate that more active users in the system are more particularly interested in the recommender-switching feature. This finding is consistent with those of Dooms [6].…”
Section: Rq1: Users Switch Algorithmssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…In this work, we take a very basic approach to incorporating users' explicit feedback into the recommender selection process: we invite users to try different recommender algorithms and pick the one they want to use. This is similar to the work of Dooms, where users were given some control over their recommendations [6]; some results in that work parallel ours.…”
Section: Background and Related Worksupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Besides awareness and explanation, allowing users to take control of the filtering process and its outcome is also important (Dooms 2013;Loepp et al 2014;Mcnee et al 2003). User's control can not only provide feedback to the filtering algorithm for adjustment, but also increase user's satisfaction, as well as persuasiveness of the recommended messages through a sense of control and confidence (Cleger-Tamayo et al 2013;Tintarev and Masthoff 2012).…”
Section: Necessity Of Providing Awareness Explanation and Control Inmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The importance of awareness and explanation has been discussed in previous studies (Scheel et al 2014;Johnson and Johnson 1993), that lack of such transparency can lead to reduced user satisfaction (e.g., trust toward personalized filtering) in the system (Sinha and Swearingen 2002;Kay and Kummerfeld 2013;Lim et al 2009). Therefore, it is necessary to allow users to take control of the filtering process and its outcome (Dooms 2013;Loepp et al 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considerable amount of techniques have been proposed to design the user model in terms of resource recommendations [21] [8]. Among them, some approaches aim to provide dynamically adapted personalized recommendations to users [13].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%