Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on World Wide Web 2015
DOI: 10.1145/2740908.2743057
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Attention Please! A Hybrid Resource Recommender Mimicking Attention-Interpretation Dynamics

Abstract: Classic resource recommenders like Collaborative Filtering (CF) treat users as being just another entity, neglecting nonlinear user-resource dynamics shaping attention and interpretation. In this paper, we propose a novel hybrid recommendation strategy that refines CF by capturing these dynamics. The evaluation results reveal that our approach substantially improves CF and, depending on the dataset, successfully competes with a computationally much more expensive Matrix Factorization variant.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
(54 reference statements)
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Evaluation protocol. We split the datasets into train and test sets (Cremonesi et al, 2008) and make sure that our evaluation protocol preserves the temporal order of the listening events, which simulates a real-world scenario in which we predict (genres of) future listening events based on past ones (Kowald et al, 2017b;Seitlinger et al, 2015). This also means that a classic k-fold crossvalidation evaluation protocol with random splits is not useful.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Evaluation protocol. We split the datasets into train and test sets (Cremonesi et al, 2008) and make sure that our evaluation protocol preserves the temporal order of the listening events, which simulates a real-world scenario in which we predict (genres of) future listening events based on past ones (Kowald et al, 2017b;Seitlinger et al, 2015). This also means that a classic k-fold crossvalidation evaluation protocol with random splits is not useful.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tags were also seen as a way to negotiate the meaning of particular experiences and established shared understanding in a group of learners (Dennerlein, Seitlinger, Lex, & Ley, 2016). Several services made use of the tags produced, eg, recommender services for resources (Seitlinger et al, 2015) or tag recommenders that were intended to drive the consistency of how objects were described (Seitlinger et al, 2018).…”
Section: Knowledge Structuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research papers Model of human categorization [17,23,35] Activation processes in human memory [18,21,24,37] Informal learning se ings [5][6][7] Resource recommendations Research papers A ention-interpretation dynamics [15,34] Tag and time information [27,28] Recommendation evaluation Research papers Real-world folksonomies [20] Technology enhanced learning se ings [16] Hashtag recommendations…”
Section: Tag Recommendationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mimicking Attention-Interpretation Dynamics. Seitlinger et al [34] introduced the rst version of a CF-based recommendation approach that takes into consideration non-linear user-artifact dynamics, modeled by means of SUSTAIN. SUSTAIN (Supervised and Unsupervised STrati ed Adaptive Incremental Network) is a exible network model of human category learning that is thoroughly discussed in [29].…”
Section: Resource Recommendationsmentioning
confidence: 99%