2015
DOI: 10.1002/ett.2942
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamic frame aggregation scheduler for multimedia applications in IEEE 802.11n networks

Abstract: International audienceProviding Quality of Service (QoS) to real time applications over Wireless Local Area Networks (WLANs) is becoming a very challenging task due to the diversity of multimedia applications. Concurrently, there are numerous WLANs devices that are rising recently. Mainly, we focus on IEEE 802.11n since it was designed to support a high data transmission rate (toward 600 Mbps) based on frame aggregation schemes. The aggregation mechanism accumulates many frames before transmitting them into a … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
(51 reference statements)
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Table 1 presents an overview of the related work in IEEE 802.11 networks, summarizing how each approach targets network management, QoS support, the RA method, and the tools used for experimentation. After the IEEE 802.11e amendment [23] established the foundations for traffic prioritization, many investigations focused on queuing management as a means to enhance QoS [24][25][26][27]. Most work concentrated on scheduling schemes incorporating the length of the traffic queues, the time to serve a packet, or the time waiting on the scheduler.…”
Section: Resource Allocation and Qos Supportmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table 1 presents an overview of the related work in IEEE 802.11 networks, summarizing how each approach targets network management, QoS support, the RA method, and the tools used for experimentation. After the IEEE 802.11e amendment [23] established the foundations for traffic prioritization, many investigations focused on queuing management as a means to enhance QoS [24][25][26][27]. Most work concentrated on scheduling schemes incorporating the length of the traffic queues, the time to serve a packet, or the time waiting on the scheduler.…”
Section: Resource Allocation and Qos Supportmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, those streams require better QoS. However, aggregation of multiple streams together imposes giving all the streams the same QoS [3,[25][26][27].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, packet multiplexing degrades the QoS of VoIP. As discussed above, the delay, jitter, and packet loss will increase if the multiplexing method is unsuitable [7], [8], [18], [37], [38], [54]. Second, bandwidth utilization is ineffective in the case of few calls and multi-path routing because fewer packets are available for multiplexing [52], [55].…”
Section: Handicaps Of Packet Multiplexingmentioning
confidence: 99%