1997
DOI: 10.1007/bf02945263
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamic fracture characteristics of highly brittle materials by using Instrumented Charpy Impact Test

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the value of c ave is close to 0, and the P value is close to 1, showing that the value of c ave is extremely insignificant. Compared with the energy dissipating during elastic deformation and the plastic deformation energy, the surface energy of materials used in this research is much smaller than first two with a couple of orders of magnitude differences [13]. erefore, as a result of regression analysis, the insignificance of c ave is reasonable, suggesting that c ave may be ignored under low accuracy requirement.…”
Section: Analysis Of Impact Test Resultsmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…However, the value of c ave is close to 0, and the P value is close to 1, showing that the value of c ave is extremely insignificant. Compared with the energy dissipating during elastic deformation and the plastic deformation energy, the surface energy of materials used in this research is much smaller than first two with a couple of orders of magnitude differences [13]. erefore, as a result of regression analysis, the insignificance of c ave is reasonable, suggesting that c ave may be ignored under low accuracy requirement.…”
Section: Analysis Of Impact Test Resultsmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Therefore many researchers have investigated the calculating method of a crack extension directly from the load -load-line displacement record, such as key curve method [3], load normalization method [4][5], load ratio method [6][7] and etc. These methods are applied to calculate the crack length on the fracture resistance test for not only the standard specimens but also specimens of various types [8][9][10]. Also among these, the load normalization method was proposed to calculate the crack length under the dynamic loading condition in the standard test method [1] that modified recently.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%