2014
DOI: 10.3389/feart.2014.00013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamic feeder dyke systems in basaltic volcanoes: the exceptional example of the 1809 Etna eruption (Italy)

Abstract: The detection and understanding of the movement of magma at very shallow levels remains one of the most fascinating challenges of modern volcanology, because such information allows us to identify and circumscribe the most probable location where future eruptive vents will open. Unfortunately, it is rarely possible to observe any detail of the internal structure of the feeder system of recent eruptions; in only very few cases, geological observations in dissected volcanoes can help us imagine how magma moved a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
19
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
(40 reference statements)
2
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It seems that dyke thicknesses are—at least partially—controlled by the stiffness of the intruded rocks (Figure ), as thicker dykes are only found cutting the relatively more compliant breccias (typical stiffness of 1–10 GPa: Gudmundsson, , ; Gudmundsson et al., ), while thinner dykes cut both more compliant and stiffer volcanic sequences (typical stiffness up to 100 GPa: Gudmundsson, , ; Gudmundsson et al., ). This relation matches fully the results obtained from models and previous field studies (see Geshi, Kusumoto, & Gudmundsson, , ; Geshi & Neri, ; Gudmundsson et al., ; Keating, Valentine, Krier, & Perry, ; Rivalta, Böttinger, Schnese, & Dahm, ; Rivalta, Taisne, Bunger, & Katz, ). However, we found no dykes intruding layers with different stiffness.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…It seems that dyke thicknesses are—at least partially—controlled by the stiffness of the intruded rocks (Figure ), as thicker dykes are only found cutting the relatively more compliant breccias (typical stiffness of 1–10 GPa: Gudmundsson, , ; Gudmundsson et al., ), while thinner dykes cut both more compliant and stiffer volcanic sequences (typical stiffness up to 100 GPa: Gudmundsson, , ; Gudmundsson et al., ). This relation matches fully the results obtained from models and previous field studies (see Geshi, Kusumoto, & Gudmundsson, , ; Geshi & Neri, ; Gudmundsson et al., ; Keating, Valentine, Krier, & Perry, ; Rivalta, Böttinger, Schnese, & Dahm, ; Rivalta, Taisne, Bunger, & Katz, ). However, we found no dykes intruding layers with different stiffness.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The brecciated nature of dykes has previously been explained as due to mechanical erosion processes—such as particle collision and wall collapse—or as related to phreato‐magmatic or, more generally, an explosively driven origin (eg, Geshi & Neri, and references therein; Vezzoli & Corazzato, ). Other studies show dykes with bulging and lobate margins intruding brecciated host rocks, resulting from magma propagation along a self‐induced shear fault (eg, Mathieu, van Wyk Vries, Holohan, & Troll, ; Petronis et al., ); in these cases, a mix of dyke breccia and crushed host rock is observed (Petronis et al., ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Drainage has also been inferred from studies of exposed vent deposits and dyke feeder systems at a range of depths (Lefebvre et al 2012;Geshi and Neri 2014;Wadsworth et al 2015). At greater depths, regions of both upwards and downwards flow have been identified within a single camptonite dyke at Higby Mountain, Connecticut (Philpotts and Philpotts 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%