Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Citation Types
Year Published
Publication Types
Relationship
Authors
Journals
I N'I'ItODUC'TIOK r .1 It(: pro(ws of assessitig unitit,cgrated niotivatiotis as causes of immediate behavior has l m t i a ('onimoti dynamic method, but one which has defied validation through empiric.al procedures. Howver, as a result of t,he work done by Cattell"), with Baggalcy'", and ivith Iladcliffe and S\wney(3", a new method for assessing inotivation has been added which by its very nature makes it possible to measure various depths or dimensions of interest strettgth in motivating attitudes. Analyses of nieasiiremtiit, devices show that some measures, such as selective information, connotative c*losurc., a i d selective perception, are highly related to integrated, cognitive, realit,y-orietited motivat,ion. Other devices, such as autism and selective tiieniory, are highly titiintegrated by nature ant1 yield measures of phantasy-bound, unrealized motivation. Utilizing these principles, a dichotomy of integrated us. unintegrated motivatioii has been established as a means of comparing general patterns of motivatioital expression found in the general populat,ion. PROCEDUREEighty-tiitie, sevetith atid eighth grade, rural school children were given a five hour battery of objertive measurements of interest strength in thirty-six attitudes iilready found t o be salients of the eighteen drive structures found in children by Swetrey and Cattell ( R * 5 I . The devices iticludc word association, information, autism atid seIect,ive memory. The first two are integrated devices associated with integrated manifestations of motivation while the latter two have been associated with the unintegrat etl manifcstations of motivation.The tcast,s \wrc scored in accordance with the principles of the devices and in agreement 1vit.h mtistructioti of the items. No subsequent item purification was used a t this point.. The sc-ores for the thirty-six attitudes were standardized by subject in each device yielding ipsative or relative scores of interest strength in the attitudes. The standard scores for the informat,ion and word association tests were added to yield a single integrated score for each attitude atid the scores on autism and selective memory were added to yield unintegrated scores.;\I1 seventy-t,ivo measures, 36 integrated and 36 unintegrated attitudes, were iiitercorrelated. This matrix was factored to yield twenty-two centroid factors to fulfill the required number of constructs to be manipulated, four instrument factors and eighteen drive factors. This was very close to the number of factors prescribed by Tucker's (*riteria for termination of factorization. The centroid matric was then partitioned into the unintegrated and integrated realms. The integrated centroids were rotated independently to a position which optimized the drive structure found i i i previous studies. The position thus found was projeected upon the uriintegrated measures hy reassembling the original centroid factors. RESULTS'l'he obtaittod rotated simple structure contained 81% of the variables in the hyperplane, with only one or two off-diagonal ...
I N'I'ItODUC'TIOK r .1 It(: pro(ws of assessitig unitit,cgrated niotivatiotis as causes of immediate behavior has l m t i a ('onimoti dynamic method, but one which has defied validation through empiric.al procedures. Howver, as a result of t,he work done by Cattell"), with Baggalcy'", and ivith Iladcliffe and S\wney(3", a new method for assessing inotivation has been added which by its very nature makes it possible to measure various depths or dimensions of interest strettgth in motivating attitudes. Analyses of nieasiiremtiit, devices show that some measures, such as selective information, connotative c*losurc., a i d selective perception, are highly related to integrated, cognitive, realit,y-orietited motivat,ion. Other devices, such as autism and selective tiieniory, are highly titiintegrated by nature ant1 yield measures of phantasy-bound, unrealized motivation. Utilizing these principles, a dichotomy of integrated us. unintegrated motivatioii has been established as a means of comparing general patterns of motivatioital expression found in the general populat,ion. PROCEDUREEighty-tiitie, sevetith atid eighth grade, rural school children were given a five hour battery of objertive measurements of interest strength in thirty-six attitudes iilready found t o be salients of the eighteen drive structures found in children by Swetrey and Cattell ( R * 5 I . The devices iticludc word association, information, autism atid seIect,ive memory. The first two are integrated devices associated with integrated manifestations of motivation while the latter two have been associated with the unintegrat etl manifcstations of motivation.The tcast,s \wrc scored in accordance with the principles of the devices and in agreement 1vit.h mtistructioti of the items. No subsequent item purification was used a t this point.. The sc-ores for the thirty-six attitudes were standardized by subject in each device yielding ipsative or relative scores of interest strength in the attitudes. The standard scores for the informat,ion and word association tests were added to yield a single integrated score for each attitude atid the scores on autism and selective memory were added to yield unintegrated scores.;\I1 seventy-t,ivo measures, 36 integrated and 36 unintegrated attitudes, were iiitercorrelated. This matrix was factored to yield twenty-two centroid factors to fulfill the required number of constructs to be manipulated, four instrument factors and eighteen drive factors. This was very close to the number of factors prescribed by Tucker's (*riteria for termination of factorization. The centroid matric was then partitioned into the unintegrated and integrated realms. The integrated centroids were rotated independently to a position which optimized the drive structure found i i i previous studies. The position thus found was projeected upon the uriintegrated measures hy reassembling the original centroid factors. RESULTS'l'he obtaittod rotated simple structure contained 81% of the variables in the hyperplane, with only one or two off-diagonal ...
The theory of fluid and crystallired intelligence propounded 20 years ago by the author has since accumulated support. However, the crucial issue of whether 1 or 2 general factors subtend intellectual performances has lacked an experiment adequately designed for accurate, determinate, simple-structure rotation at the 2nd order. By factoring culturally embedded with culture-fair intelligence measures on a background of pure personality primaries (N = 277 7th and 8th grade boys and girls), it is shown that 2 general factors indeed exist. A review, with some mathematical formulations, is given of the theory's implications for the naturenurture ratio, brain injury, standard deviation of the IQ, growth curves, the concept of a relational difficulty hierarchy, test standardization, and the relative validities of traditional and culture-fair intelligence tests PRESENT TRENDS IN INTELLIGENCE CONCEPTS l 8 In the Universal Index (VI.) system proposed elsewhere (Cattell, 1957c; Cattell & Warburton, 1963), to preserve factor identification during changing explanatory development, U.I. (T) 1 was assigned to general ability and UJ. (T) 2 to flexibility of closure, in French's (1951) series. However, as pointed out elsewhere (Cattell, 1957a, p. 830), there is increasing evidence that flexibility of closure is really the Personality Factor UJ. (T) 19, outcropping in ability when ability tests only are used. Accordingly it preserves the historical importance of order in the index much better if the U J. (T) 2 niche-flexibility going to UJ. (T) 19-is now allocated to crystallized general ability, and flexibility removed to UJ. 19.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.