1990
DOI: 10.1037/0033-3204.27.3.350
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamic factors in patient assessment and prediction of change in short-term dynamic psychotherapy.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
15
0
2

Year Published

1991
1991
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
2
15
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The current study suggests that careful assessment of patients, including the use of projective techniques, provides meaningful data that can inform treatment planning and process, a finding consistent with previous studies that focused on projective measures, including measures of object relations (Alpher, Henry, & Strupp, 1990;Piper et al, 1991). It is worth noting that careful selection of object relations measures as suggested by others (Huprich & Greenberg, 2003;Stricker & Gooen Piels, 2004) will allow identification of specific components of the therapy process, including alliance that might be affected.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…The current study suggests that careful assessment of patients, including the use of projective techniques, provides meaningful data that can inform treatment planning and process, a finding consistent with previous studies that focused on projective measures, including measures of object relations (Alpher, Henry, & Strupp, 1990;Piper et al, 1991). It is worth noting that careful selection of object relations measures as suggested by others (Huprich & Greenberg, 2003;Stricker & Gooen Piels, 2004) will allow identification of specific components of the therapy process, including alliance that might be affected.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…Using a variety of non-Rorschach assessment methods, many studies show that interpersonal variables and defenses are related to important psychotherapy process and outcome variables (e.g., Filak, Abeles, & Norquist, 1986;Ogrodniczuk, Piper, Joyce, & McCallum, 2001;Paivio & Bahr, 1998;Perry, 2001). Regarding the Rorschach in particular, various types of Rorschach interpersonal scores are related to treatment variables such as treatment outcome (e.g., Alpher, Henry, & Strupp, 1990;Blatt & Ford, 1994), therapist-client agreement on treatment goals (Bihlar & Carlsson, 2000, 2001, and dropout (Hilsenroth, Handler, Toman, & Padawer, 1995).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…SASB has shown promise in the analysis of family processes (e.g., Benjamin, Foster, Giat-Roberto, & Estroff, 1986;Humphrey & Benjamin, 1986). It has been shown to be sensitive to changes in perceptions of self and relationships with others in psychotherapy (Alpher, Henry, & Strupp, 1990;Henry, Schacht, & Strupp, 1986Quintana & Meara, 1990;Talley, Strupp, & Morey, 1990). Its utility has been demonstrated in several studies of psychopathology (Alpher, I992a, 1992b;Alpher & France, 1993;Benjamin, 1993;Benjamin & Wonderlich, 1994;Humphrey, Apple, & Kirschenbaum, 1986;Wonderlich & Swift, 1990).…”
Section: The Interpersonal Approachmentioning
confidence: 94%