2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.12.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamic evolution of ecological carrying capacity based on the ecological footprint theory: A case study of Jiangsu province

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
44
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 102 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
44
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The term "carrying capacity" is derived from ecology, which is used to measure the largest organisms that a specific region can support for some period of time without obvious adverse effect on the local environment [12]. After that, the application field of carrying capacity continued to expand, and the ecological carrying capacity [13], environmental carrying capacity [14], land carrying capacity [15], and mineral resources carrying capacity [16] appeared one after the other. WRCC is an extension of the concept of carrying capacity in the field of water resources, which focuses on the interaction between the human system and the water resources system.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The term "carrying capacity" is derived from ecology, which is used to measure the largest organisms that a specific region can support for some period of time without obvious adverse effect on the local environment [12]. After that, the application field of carrying capacity continued to expand, and the ecological carrying capacity [13], environmental carrying capacity [14], land carrying capacity [15], and mineral resources carrying capacity [16] appeared one after the other. WRCC is an extension of the concept of carrying capacity in the field of water resources, which focuses on the interaction between the human system and the water resources system.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the 200 years since its conception, the research on carrying capacity has changed from researches of biotic population growth law to the comprehensive carrying capacity covering natural resource endowments and human development demands [12]. The scopes of carrying capacity applications have been expanded, such as land resource carrying capacity [13,14], water resource carrying capacity [15][16][17], environmental carrying capacity [18][19][20], ecological carrying capacity [21][22][23], cultural carrying capacity [24,25], social carrying capacity [26,27] and comprehensive resources and environmental carrying capacity [28][29][30][31]. The progression of carrying capacity has gradually attached importance to the influence of human activity factors on the carrying capacity [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The concept "resources and environment carrying capacity (RECC)" covers the connotation of multiple dimensions, including resource, environment, ecology, disaster, society, and economy. In terms of the resource dimension, carrying capacity refers to the capacity of resources to supply the environmental system and human needs [6][7][8][9][10]; in terms of the environment dimension, carrying capacity refers to the maintenance function of good environmental quality with the dilution and self-purification of pollution; in terms of the ecology dimension, carrying capacity refers to the capacity to provide supply, adjustment, culture, and support for the existence of humans [11][12][13][14]; in terms of the social and economic dimension, carrying capacity refers to the intensity, scope, and relevant threshold of natural resources and environment to carry humans and social and economic activities of humans and, within the threshold system, the resource and environment system will not sustain obvious degeneration or collapse [14][15][16][17]. In addition, from the perspective of disaster response, there is the concept of disaster carrying capacity which refers to the overall resistance capacity of disaster carrying systems, including resources and the environment, to natural disasters [18,19].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%