Dynamic effects and spatial heterogeneity of land supply on housing price: evidence from Nanchang, China

Abstract

Purpose Economic fundamentals are recognized as determining factors for housing on the city level, but the relationship between housing price and land supply has been disputed. This study aims to examine what kind of impact housing prices have on land supply and whether there is heterogeneity in different regional spaces. Design/methodology/approach This study collects the relevant data of land supply and housing prices in Nanchang from 2010 to 2018, constructs a vector autoregression (VAR) model, including one external factor and four internal factors of land supply to explore the dynamic effects and spatial heterogeneity of land supply on housing prices through regression analysis. Also, the authors use the geographic detector to analyze the spatial heterogeneity of housing prices in Nanchang. Findings This study found that the interaction between land supply and housing price is extremely complex because of the significant differences in the study area; the variables of land supply have both positive and negative effects on housing price, and the actual effect varies with the region; and residential land and GDP are the two major factors leading to the spatial heterogeneity in housing price. Research limitations/implications The dynamic effects of land supply on housing price are mainly reflected in the center and edge of the city, the new development area, and the old town, which is consistent with the spatial pattern of the double core, three circles and five groups in Nanchang. Originality/value This is a novel work to analyze the dynamic effects of land supply on house prices, instead of a single amount of land supply or land prices. Furthermore, the authors also explore the spatial heterogeneity according to the regional characteristics, which is conducive to targeted policymaking.

Analysis of the WeWork Bankruptcy Case

“…WeWork Corporate governance issues are also one of the most important factors leading to bankruptcy. Sui once pointed out that the disadvantages of family management mode include single property right structure, failure of decision-making caused by paternalistic management, cronyism, and uneven distribution of interests and internal strife, which seriously restrict the development of family business [8]. The founder and former CEO Adam Neumann of WeWork, who focused on his personal goals, took up company resources and made risky investments, which led to confusion and bad decisions.…”