2015
DOI: 10.36876/smjo.1025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamic Distraction External Fixation Derived from the SUZUKI Frame for PIP Joint Fractures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…One highly successful external fixator is the one described by Suzuki et al [1], that uses the pins and rubbers to provide traction to the fracture. This system is capable of treating a wide range of complex intra-articular fractures involving the hand, including PIP fractures, metacarpophalangeal joint (MCPJ), and first carpometacarpal joint (CMCJ), with good ROM results at final follow up [5][6][7]. Some variations or this system were described [2][3][4][5][6][7][8], using more available materials but nevertheless following the same principles.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…One highly successful external fixator is the one described by Suzuki et al [1], that uses the pins and rubbers to provide traction to the fracture. This system is capable of treating a wide range of complex intra-articular fractures involving the hand, including PIP fractures, metacarpophalangeal joint (MCPJ), and first carpometacarpal joint (CMCJ), with good ROM results at final follow up [5][6][7]. Some variations or this system were described [2][3][4][5][6][7][8], using more available materials but nevertheless following the same principles.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This system is capable of treating a wide range of complex intra-articular fractures involving the hand, including PIP fractures, metacarpophalangeal joint (MCPJ), and first carpometacarpal joint (CMCJ), with good ROM results at final follow up [5][6][7]. Some variations or this system were described [2][3][4][5][6][7][8], using more available materials but nevertheless following the same principles. Our external fixator is more similar to the one described by Crowley et al [9], that presented a case of a contaminated fracture associated to an FDP avulsion, which presented a ROM of the PIP joint of 15-95° at final follow-up of one year.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Jedes Verfahren hat spezifische Vor-und Nachteile. Der externe Distraktionsfixateur bietet sich als Behandlungsform in verschiedenen Varianten an [2,3]. Mit ihm kann jedoch das zentral imprimierte Fragment nicht reponiert werden.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified