2017 IEEE Applied Power Electronics Conference and Exposition (APEC) 2017
DOI: 10.1109/apec.2017.7930750
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamic decoupling control method for PMSM drive with cross-coupling inductances

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The discharge is requested when the rotor speed reaches 157rad/s at around 1s, at which time the DC-bus voltage drops to 100 V rapidly and takes 4.9 s to decline below the safety voltage, being a little bit shorter than the simulation. Once the discharge is required, the d-axis current drops to -30 A quickly and track the reference current until 8.5 s. The q-axis current is almost zero at the beginning of the discharge but gradually increasing until 8.5 s due to the cross-coupling [25]- [26] effect. Then both the d-axis and q-axis current decline to zero as the energy in the motor has been almost dissipated.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The discharge is requested when the rotor speed reaches 157rad/s at around 1s, at which time the DC-bus voltage drops to 100 V rapidly and takes 4.9 s to decline below the safety voltage, being a little bit shorter than the simulation. Once the discharge is required, the d-axis current drops to -30 A quickly and track the reference current until 8.5 s. The q-axis current is almost zero at the beginning of the discharge but gradually increasing until 8.5 s due to the cross-coupling [25]- [26] effect. Then both the d-axis and q-axis current decline to zero as the energy in the motor has been almost dissipated.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It should also be mentioned that nowadays also numerous publications are available in which, for example in [9], the existence of magnetic cross-coupling between the stator current components and the induced voltages caused by them is assumed. This is not taken into account in the present paper in order to avoid expansiveness, although such decoupling measures can in principle also be integrated into the analyzed methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Others propose the complex vector SRF PI CC to provide better cross-coupling compensation [7,9,10]. The design of the CC has also been presented in [11,12] as a multiinput multi output controller which known by dynamic decoupling CC to improve the cross-coupling compensation. The advanced angle delay has been introduced in [13] to improve the control performance by compensating the delay in the angle due to the rotating d-q frame.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The advanced angle delay has been introduced in [13] to improve the control performance by compensating the delay in the angle due to the rotating d-q frame. However, despite the widespread usage and development of SRF PI CCs, the gains' selection are mostly based on trial and error or common methods, which set rules for the PI gains in order to achieve a targeted performance, such as poleplacement [14,15] , pole/zero cancelation [10,12,16] ,Ziegler-Nichols and Cohen-Coon methods [17,18]. These rules are based on assumption of no time delay through the current control loop.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%