2008
DOI: 10.1007/s10596-007-9063-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamic data integration for structural modeling: model screening approach using a distance-based model parameterization

Abstract: This paper proposes a novel history-matching method where reservoir structure is inverted from dynamic fluid flow response. The proposed workflow consists of searching for models that match production history from a large set of prior structural model realizations. This prior set represents the reservoir structural uncertainty because of interpretation uncertainty on seismic sections. To make such a search effective, we introduce a parameter space defined with a "similarity distance" for accommodating this lar… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
59
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 111 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
59
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In recent years, new approaches have been developed to create multiple realisations for uncertainty estimations in complex three-dimensional structural geological models (e.g., [12,13,20,23,24,[26][27][28][29]). It is expected that an application of information theoretic measures to these more complex settings will reveal novel and valuable insights into uncertainties and their potential reduction in realistic research and exploration scenarios.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In recent years, new approaches have been developed to create multiple realisations for uncertainty estimations in complex three-dimensional structural geological models (e.g., [12,13,20,23,24,[26][27][28][29]). It is expected that an application of information theoretic measures to these more complex settings will reveal novel and valuable insights into uncertainties and their potential reduction in realistic research and exploration scenarios.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several methods addressing the analysis and visualisation of subsurface structural uncertainties have been developed in recent years (e.g., [11][12][13][23][24][25]). Structural geological models, reflecting the result of geological history over millions of years, are inherently three-dimensional and contain complex correlation structures, for example due to offset along a fault, or multiple folding patterns.…”
Section: Estimation Of Uncertainty Correlation and Reduction In A Geomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For a detailed description, we refer to [7]. For the application of MDS in uncertainty quantification, we refer to [32,35] and [8]. MDS uses the SVD to determine a low-order set of dimensionless directions in which the relative distances between the objects can be efficiently represented.…”
Section: Visualization Of Dissimilaritiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[35] and [8] have used the permeability fields as a measure of dissimilarity. This has been done by defining a metric space to compare and cluster geological models that share common geological features.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such a set of realizations could be filtered by validation codes such as balanced restoration and geomechanical modeling (Maerten and Maerten 2006;Moretti 2008;Muron 2005). Another avenue for further progresses also covers assimilation of complex data such as reservoir production history for discarding possible structural interpretations (Suzuki et al 2008;Tarantola 2006). …”
Section: Recent and Ongoing Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%