Building a 3D geological model from field and subsurface data is a typical task in geological studies involving natural resource evaluation and hazard assessment. However, there is quite often a gap between research papers presenting case studies or specific innovations in 3D modeling and the objectives of a typical class in 3D structural modeling, as more and more is implemented at universities. In this paper, we present general procedures and guidelines to effectively build a structural model made of faults and horizons from typical sparse data. Then we describe a typical 3D structural modeling workflow based on triangulated surfaces. Our goal is not to replace software user guides, but to provide key concepts, principles, and procedures to be applied during geomodeling tasks, with a specific focus on quality control. Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (http://dx

International audienceThe terrigeneous sediment budget of passive margin basins records variations in continental relief triggered by either deformation or climate. Consequently, it becomes a major challenge to determine sediment accumulation histories in a large number of basins found in various geodynamic contexts. In this study, we developed a GIS-based method to determine the sediment budget at the scale of a whole basin (from the upstream continental onlap to the most distal deepest marine deposits) and the associated uncertainties. The volume of sediments preserved in the basin for each time interval was estimated by interpolation between cross-sections and then corrected from in situ production and porosity to obtain terrigeneous solid volumes. This approach was validated by applying it to Namibia-South African passive margin basins for which independent data are available. We determined by a statistical approach the variances associated with each parameter of the method: the geometrical extrapolation of the section (8-43%), the uncertainties on seismic velocities for the depth conversion (2-10%), on the absolute ages of stratigraphic horizons (0.2-12%), on the carbonate content (0.2-46%) and on remaining porosities estimation (3-5%). Our estimates of the accumulated volumes were validated by comparison with previous estimates at a lower temporal resolution in the same area. We discussed variations in accumulation rates observed in terms of relief variations triggered by climate and/or deformation. The high accumulation rates determined for the Lower Cretaceous, progressively decreasing to a minimum in the Mid-Cretaceous, are consistent with the progressive relaxation of a rift-related relief. The following increase to an Upper Cretaceous maximum is consistent with a major relief reorganization driven either by an uplift and/or a change to more humid climate conditions. The lower accumulation rate in the Cenozoic suggests a relief reorganization of lesser amplitude over that period

International audienceThe development of the Alpine mountain belt has been governed by the convergence of the African and European plates since the Late Cretaceous. During the Cenozoic, this orogeny was accompanied with two major kinds of intraplate deformation in the NW-European foreland: (1) the European Cenozoic Rift System (ECRIS), a left-lateral transtensional wrench zone striking NNE-SSW between the western Mediterranean Sea and the Bohemian Massif; (2) long-wavelength lithospheric folds striking NE and located between the Alpine front and the North Sea. The present-day geometry of the European crust comprises the signatures of these two events superimposed on all preceding ones. In order to better define the processes and causes of each event, we identify and separate their respective geometrical signatures on depth maps of the pre-Mesozoic basement and of the Moho. We derive the respective timing of rifting and folding from sedimentary accumulation curves computed for selected locations of the Upper Rhine Graben. From this geometrical and chronological separation, we infer that the ECRIS developed mostly from 37 to 17 Ma, in response to north-directed impingement of Adria into the European plate. Lithospheric folds developed between 17 and 0 Ma, after the azimuth of relative displacement between Adria and Europe turned counter-clockwise to NW SE. The geometry of these folds (wavelength = 270 km; amplitude = 1,500 m) is consistent with the geometry, as predicted by analogue and numerical models, of buckle folds produced by horizontal shortening of the whole lithosphere. The development of the folds resulted in ca. 1,000 m of rock uplift along the hinge lines of the anticlines (Burgundy Swabian Jura and Normandy Vogelsberg) and ca. 500 m of rock subsidence along the hinge line of the intervening syncline (Sologne Franconian Basin). The grabens of the ECRIS were tilted by the development of the folds, and their rift-related sedimentary infill was reduced on anticlines, while sedimentary accumulation was enhanced in synclines. We interpret the occurrence of Miocene volcanic activity and of topographic highs, and the basement and Moho configurations in the Vosges Black Forest area and in the Rhenish Massif as interference patterns between linear lithospheric anticlines and linear grabens, rather than as signatures of asthenospheric plumes

International audienceA synthesis of existing geological, structural and geophysical data shows that the south Armorican Hercynian belt was marked by syn-convergence crustal thinning and dextral wrenching that were in part coeval in late Carboniferous times. Our kinematic model is further supported by new structural data and 40Ar/39Ar ages on synkinematic leucogranites. Extension and strike-slip followed earlier crustal thickening and exhumation of high-pressure metamorphic units in late Devonian-early Carboniferous times. Crustal extension led to the development of core complexes cored by migmatites and crust-derived granite laccoliths. At this time, the South Armorican shear zone acted as a transfer zone separating the extending domain of South Brittany from the non-extending domain of Central Brittany submitted to dextral wrenching. The overall structural pattern and attached kinematics are compared with recent numerical models and illustrated by a 3D interpretative model that integrates geological and deep seismic reflection data (ARMOR 2 profile)

No abstract

New 40Ar/39Ar dating performed on Rare Metal Granites and W ± Sn deposits in the northern Limousin has provided evidence of two metallogenic episodes. An Early Namurian episode (c. 325 Ma) was contemporaneous with the emplacement of the large peraluminous leucogranite bodies, which are associated with small W ± Sn deposits, but also with some larger deposits, at Puy-les-Vignes (323.4 ± 0.9 Ma) and Moulin-Barret (323.7 ± 0.8 Ma) formed at a shallower level above cryptic granite plutons. These new data indicate that the metallogenic potential of the Namurian leucogranites might have been underestimated. Most other W ± Sn deposits in the northern Limousin area are attributed to a Mid-Westphalian episode (c. 310 Ma), and are contemporaneous with the emplacement of all the Rare Metal Granites. Both episodes were related to leucogranite emplacement and associated fluid circulations, but in two different geodynamic contexts. The Early Namurian episode may be related to syncollisional extension of the Variscan belt, whereas the Mid-Westphalian one occurs during generalized extension and rapid exhumation of the belt associated with the granulite-facies metamorphism of the lower lithosphere probably related to the delamination of the lower lithosphere. Thus, W ± Sn and rare metals (Ta, Nb, Be, Li) deposits are clearly temporally and probably genetically related to leucogranitic magmatism.

[1] The constantly improving resolution of geophysical data, seismic tomography and seismicity in particular, shows that the lithosphere does not subduct as a slab of uniform thickness but is rather thinned in the upper mantle and thickened around the transition zone between the upper and lower mantle. This observation has traditionally been interpreted as evidence for the buckling and piling of slabs at the boundary between the upper and lower mantle, where a strong contrast in viscosity may exist and cause resistance to the penetration of slabs into the lower mantle. The distribution and character of seismicity reveal, however, that slabs undergo vertical extension in the upper mantle and compression near the transition zone. In this paper, we demonstrate that during the subduction process, the shape of low viscosity slabs (1 to 100 times more viscous than the surrounding mantle) evolves toward an inverted plume shape that we coin jellyfish. Results of a 3D numerical model show that the leading tip of slabs deform toward a rounded head skirted by lateral tentacles that emerge from the sides of the jellyfish head. The head is linked to the body of the subducting slab by a thin tail. A complete parametric study reveals that subducting slabs may achieve a variety of shapes, in good agreement with the diversity of natural slab shapes evidenced by seismic tomography. Our work also suggests that the slab to mantle viscosity ratio in the Earth is most likely to be lower than 100. However, the sensitivity of slab shapes to upper and lower mantle viscosities and densities, which remain poorly constrained by independent evidence, precludes any systematic deciphering of the observations.

International audienceThe morphology of the Pyrenees is characterized by the presence of high-elevation, low-relief surfaces. The origin of these Lower-Miocene surfaces is still debated. Two major interpretations have been proposed, both assuming that these surfaces are remnants of a single composite planation surface. The first interpretation proposes that this surface corresponds to a peneplain developed near sea level before the Late Miocene, subsequently uplifted and dissected. The present-day Pyrenees is therefore supposed to rise from the Late Miocene. In the second interpretation, the rise of the efficient base level of the chain induced the progressive inhibition of erosion and the smoothing of the relief before the Late Miocene, resulting in a highly elevated peneplain. According to this latter interpretation, the high elevation of the low-relief surfaces does not equate to post-orogenic uplift. We test these two interpretations by investigating, among other considerations, the relation between the elevation of the planation surface remnants and the deep structure of the chain. We find that (1) the isostatic compensation of the dissected Pyrenean planation surface by crustal thickening and (2) the absence of thinning of the lithosphere mantle below the chain favors the second interpretation