2012 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC) 2012
DOI: 10.1109/icc.2012.6364406
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamic cooperation link selection for network MIMO systems with limited backhaul capacity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Utility maximization for the network MIMO system considered in existing literature mostly takes the limited backhaul capacities into account implicitly by either fixing the BS clusters [5]- [7] or adding the backhaul as a penalized term into the objective function [8]- [10]. Specifically, [5] considers sum rate maximization under fixed and non-overlapping clustering scheme while [6] and [7] maximize a more general utility function under potentially overlapping but predetermined BS clusters.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Utility maximization for the network MIMO system considered in existing literature mostly takes the limited backhaul capacities into account implicitly by either fixing the BS clusters [5]- [7] or adding the backhaul as a penalized term into the objective function [8]- [10]. Specifically, [5] considers sum rate maximization under fixed and non-overlapping clustering scheme while [6] and [7] maximize a more general utility function under potentially overlapping but predetermined BS clusters.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For fixed clustering scheme assumed in [5]- [7], the backhaul consumption is only known afterwards by evaluating the rates of user messages delivered in each backhaul link. For dynamic clustering designs considered in [8]- [10], one has to optimally choose the price associated with each penalized term to ensure that the overall backhaul stays within the budget, which is not easy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Differing from the utility maximization problems in conventional wireless networks with only transmit power constraints, the additional backhaul constraints in C-RAN make the problem more challenging as the backhaul consumption at a particular BS is a function of not only the (continuous) user rates but also the (discrete) number of associated users. To tackle this mixed continuous and discrete optimization problem, existing literature mostly take the limited backhaul capacities into account implicitly either by fixing the BS clusters [27]- [29] or by adding the backhaul as a penalized term into the objective function [30]- [32]. Specifically, [27] considers sum rate maximization under fixed and disjoint clustering scheme while [28] and [29] maximize a more general utility function under user-centric but predetermined BS clusters.…”
Section: A Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This allows [12] to use a weighted MMSE technique to find a local optimal solution to the rate maximization problem. Finally, the problem setup of the present paper is also related to [13], which proposes a heuristic way of solving the problem of clustering, beamforming design, user scheduling, and power allocation in a decoupled fashion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%