2009 IEEE International Conference on Web Services 2009
DOI: 10.1109/icws.2009.77
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamic Collaborative Business Process Formulation via Ontologised Hierarchical Task Network (HTN) Planning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Instead processes are described in some hardcoded notations, e.g., Business Process Model and Notation (BPMN). Some researchers try to tackle this issue by applying semantic business process management (BPM) approaches, e.g., hierarchical task networks and Web ontologies [9], [14]. However, they are dealing rather with the task of generation of Business Process Execution Language (BPEL) specifications, but not with the task of running and monitoring execution processes thereafter.…”
Section: Cross-enterprise Collaborative Business Processesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Instead processes are described in some hardcoded notations, e.g., Business Process Model and Notation (BPMN). Some researchers try to tackle this issue by applying semantic business process management (BPM) approaches, e.g., hierarchical task networks and Web ontologies [9], [14]. However, they are dealing rather with the task of generation of Business Process Execution Language (BPEL) specifications, but not with the task of running and monitoring execution processes thereafter.…”
Section: Cross-enterprise Collaborative Business Processesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Having discussed the industry standardisation efforts and practitioners' approach to managing cBP's in Chapter 4, we will now turn our attention to interdisciplinary cBP methodologies proposed by researchers. The rapid emergence of research in Service-Oriented Computing [138,139,[161][162][163], Semantic Web [164][165][166][167], the Pragmatic Web [93,[168][169][170], dynamic formulations of cBP [171][172][173] and the ad-hoc matchmaking of cBP [44,45,[174][175][176][177] underscore the fact that most current B2B information exchange systems deal with only the syntactic aspect of understanding and the static modelling of processes. In this chapter, we shall discuss and identify gaps in current and relevant cBP research attempting to address the semantic modelling gap and the dynamic formulation and composition of cBP.…”
Section: Cross-enterprise Business Process (Cbp) Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…splits, sequence, concurrency). Some earlier literature of the top-down approach [5,163] tried to discover the optimum number of levels to decompose goals into, but recent approaches [172,173,187] have dismissed such intentions as unrealistic. There is simply no optimum number of levels to decompose to.…”
Section: Bottom-up Vs Top-down Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation