2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.neucom.2012.07.026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamic classifier ensemble using classification confidence

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The method proposed by Li et al [16] assumes that base classifiers not only make a classification decision but also return a confidence score that shows their belief that their decision is correct. Dynamic ensemble selection is performed by ordering the base classifiers according to the confidence scores and fusion is performed using weighted voting.…”
Section: Dynamic Ensemble Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The method proposed by Li et al [16] assumes that base classifiers not only make a classification decision but also return a confidence score that shows their belief that their decision is correct. Dynamic ensemble selection is performed by ordering the base classifiers according to the confidence scores and fusion is performed using weighted voting.…”
Section: Dynamic Ensemble Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Classifier selection DS, OLA, LCA, MCB, [19,7] Ensemble pruning k-NN-based DVS, KNORA, [31] Clustering-based [14] Ordering-based [16,32,10,4] Other [17] Classifier fusion DV ensemble members randomly without replacement, stopping when the probability that the predicted class will change is below a specified level. As this approach assumes homogeneous models, it aims at speeding up the classification process without significant loss in accuracy.…”
Section: Dynamic Ensemble Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We first propose a formulation of the C-bound for ensemble methods in complex output settings. To do so, we start from complex output predictors, with the objective to build a majority vote predictor out of these (as, e.g., in Cortes et al (2014); Li et al (2013)). This new formulation makes it possible to generalize all the classification-based results of Lacasse et al (2007), Laviolette et al (2011) andGermain et al (2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Meanwhile experts in computer science demonstrated that using a simple classifier is not accurate enough [9]. This indicates that approaches such as those mentioned above [3,4,5,6,7,8], which address the rust incidence rate detection using simple classifiers, lack of accuracy needed for predictions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%