Milcom 2006 2006
DOI: 10.1109/milcom.2006.302410
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamic Channel Allocation for Dynamic Spectrum Use in Wireless Sensor Networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For that, we propose a centralized multi-channel MAC protocol insensitive to the network topology change. In [8] and [9], the authors proposed a dynamic channel allocation based on agreement established between each sender and receiver nodes. Such approach may be suitable in light network but in dense network frequency negotiation messages can involve a considerable unnecessary overhead.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For that, we propose a centralized multi-channel MAC protocol insensitive to the network topology change. In [8] and [9], the authors proposed a dynamic channel allocation based on agreement established between each sender and receiver nodes. Such approach may be suitable in light network but in dense network frequency negotiation messages can involve a considerable unnecessary overhead.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1) Control channel allocation: To avoid control channel congestion [8], we propose to statically assign one control channel to each PAN. The emission power density of the UWB signals is less than -41.3 dBm/MHz [4].…”
Section: A First Level Of Channels Allocationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, we note that MMSN's schemes allocate channels in static way which limits channel utilities as a node does not permanently use its assigned channel. In [5] and [6], the authors proposed a dynamic channel allocation based on agreement established between each sender and receiver nodes. Such approach may be suitable in light network but in dense network frequency negotiation messages can involve a considerable unnecessary overhead (e.g negotiation message retransmissions following their reception failure).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%