2018
DOI: 10.1080/09638199.2018.1542451
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamic causality testing for EKC hypothesis, pollution haven hypothesis and international trade in India

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
34
1
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 112 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
10
34
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For robustness, the analysis was conducted in the following ways: For Phase 1 of the Red Line policy, the coefficients of ER1 in columns (1) to (2) are not significant, suggesting that for firms located in provinces, simply setting Red Line standards did not have any impact on firm exports; presumably, these provinces had not engaged in any real activities to manage pollution. In contrast, for firms located in provinces meeting Phase 2, the coefficients of ER2 are positive and significant at the 5% and 10% level in columns (3) to (6), indicating that when a province completes the legislation of the Red Line standards, firms located in the province experience an increase in firm exports. These findings are economically significant.…”
Section: Base Findingsmentioning
confidence: 86%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For robustness, the analysis was conducted in the following ways: For Phase 1 of the Red Line policy, the coefficients of ER1 in columns (1) to (2) are not significant, suggesting that for firms located in provinces, simply setting Red Line standards did not have any impact on firm exports; presumably, these provinces had not engaged in any real activities to manage pollution. In contrast, for firms located in provinces meeting Phase 2, the coefficients of ER2 are positive and significant at the 5% and 10% level in columns (3) to (6), indicating that when a province completes the legislation of the Red Line standards, firms located in the province experience an increase in firm exports. These findings are economically significant.…”
Section: Base Findingsmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Once environmental protections are tightened in LDCs, firms from developed countries then move away, and the exports of the host country (an LDC) stall (Kearsley and Riddel [3]; Kolcava et al [4]). The pollution haven hypothesis is supported in empirical studies in China (Xu et al [5], India (Rana and Sharma [6]), and East European countries (Martinez-Zarzoso et al [7]). In contrast to the pollution haven hypothesis, Porter [8] hypothesizes that if environmental protection policies are designed properly, they stimulate firms to innovate and compete.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…e results of regional difference in spatial effects of FDI, regional corruption, and environmental pollution are shown in Table 6. For the eastern region, the spatial lag coefficients ρ in Models (5)- (8) are positive and significant at the 5% level, and for the central region and the western region, the spatial lag coefficients ρ are negative and significant at the 5% level, indicating the regional spatial spillover effects of environmental pollution. For the eastern region and the western region, linear increasing relationships between FDI and environmental pollution are found in models (5)- (7), that is, strengthening FDI inflows fail to effectively reduce environmental pollution, and Pollution Haven Hypothesis is verified.…”
Section: Regional Difference In Spatial Effectsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…In fact, there is a large amount of literature on the environmental effects of FDI, but previous studies has been plagued by contradictory and ambiguous empirical results, resulting in three diverging perspectives. One popular view is the Pollution Haven Hypothesis, which many scholars confirmed using theoretical and empirical analyses [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%