Dynamic capabilities as antecedents of the scope of related diversification: the case of small firm accountancy practices

Abstract

We propose that differences in the scope of related diversification in firms can be accounted for by differences in their dynamic capabilities. In order to test this, we analyze 254 Norwegian small firm accountancy practices' possession of key dynamic capabilities including the heterogeneity of their human capital, their internal development routines, and their alliances with complementary service providers. We also analyze the influence of strategic choice, in terms of the positioning of the practice and its underlying strategic intent. While we observe no clear effects for these two latter factors, we find that dynamic capabilities have a distinct impact on the scope of services.

When moving information online diminishes change: advisory services to SMEs

“…Advice that builds capability is cumulative, requires persistence and delves more deeply within the firm (Brunet and New 2003). Done, Voss and Rytter (2011) in eight comparative case studies of the impact of a Manufacturing Advisory Service (MAS) intervention in the UK found only one of their companies persisted with the intervention beyond the lifetime of the external assistance; nevertheless, work on adopting management practices highlights ongoing benefits that persist (Ichniowski et al 1997, Bloom and Van Reenen 2007, Døving and Gooderham 2008.…”

Antecedents to Export Performance and How Italian and Slovanian SME's Innovate During Times of Crisis

“…Hutchinson, Fleck, and Lloyd-Reason (2009), found that fear of losing control, together with lack of knowledge about external environment, among others, are deemed to be external barriers to internationalization. Other studies have reported that in SMEs, SI is more focused on maintaining independence rather than gathering new growth opportunities (Cassar, 2007;Choi and Shepherd, 2004;Douglas, 2013;Døving and Gooderham, 2008;Dutta and Thornhill, 2008). Consequently, this divergent approach could affect export performance since firms which value long-term survival and independence will measure performance through firm longevity, while firms with a market-domination objective will be more preoccupied with growth measures (St-Pierre and Audet, 2011).…”

O impacto da diversificação na estratégia de operações de empresas de bens de capital

“…Several authors (Doving & Gooderham, 2008;Kor & Leblebici, 2005;Mota & Castro, 2004) mention the comprehension of the reasons why companies diversify and how it affects the management of their resources. These authors highlight that the strategic decisions for diversification tend to be oriented by organizational factors (internal resources), such as marketing structure, availability of their own technology, protection by patent and environmental factors (external) as a technological opportunity presented to result in a new product.…”