2021
DOI: 10.1609/aaai.v35i3.16336
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamic Anchor Learning for Arbitrary-Oriented Object Detection

Abstract: Arbitrary-oriented objects widely appear in natural scenes, aerial photographs, remote sensing images, etc., and thus arbitrary-oriented object detection has received considerable attention. Many current rotation detectors use plenty of anchors with different orientations to achieve spatial alignment with ground truth boxes. Intersection-over-Union (IoU) is then applied to sample the positive and negative candidates for training. However, we observe that the selected positive anchors cannot always ensure accur… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
33
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 169 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Extending the above horizontal case, existing rotation detection models [1], [12], [17], [36], [57] also use regression loss which simply involves an extra angle parameter θ:…”
Section: Regression Loss Design Revisit: From Horizon To Rotation Det...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Extending the above horizontal case, existing rotation detection models [1], [12], [17], [36], [57] also use regression loss which simply involves an extra angle parameter θ:…”
Section: Regression Loss Design Revisit: From Horizon To Rotation Det...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The former cannot adjust the dynamic gradient according to the length and width of the object. The latter is based on the length and width of the anchor (w a , h a ) to adjust the gradient instead of the target object (w t , h t ), which is almost ineffective for those detectors [2], [18], [36], [57], [59], [62] that use horizontal anchors for rotation detection. More importantly, they are not related to the angle of the target object when θ t = 0 • .…”
Section: Kullback-leibler Divergencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…CAD-Net [10] learns global and local contextual information of objects by computing their correlations with the global scene and local adjacent features. DAL [13] is a dynamic anchor learning method that uses a new matching mechanism to evaluate anchors and assign them more efficient labels. S 2 A-Net [14] uses a new alignment convolution, which can adaptively align convolution features according to anchors.…”
Section: Comparisons With the State-of-the-artmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1(a), HBBs representing rotated objects may contain a lot of undesirable contents such as a large amount of background for narrow objects with large aspect ratios and parts of other objects for densely distributed objects. For better localization of rotated objects, oriented bounding boxes (OBBs) are widely used in RSIs objects detection [9][10][11][12][13][14][15]. As can be seen in Fig.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After selecting a fixed number of positive candidates, the cleanliness score is used to generate soft labels for classification and weights of loss terms for regression. Similarly, Dynamic Anchor Learning (DAL) [54] selects the candidates according to the prediction results. In addition to output IoU, it also considers the input IoU to stabilize the training.…”
Section: B Label Assignmentmentioning
confidence: 99%