2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.proeng.2015.08.261
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamic Analysis of an Offshore Wind Turbine Including Soil Effects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The full aero-hydro-servo-elastic behavior of the structure was represented by two decoupled models. It has been noted [4] that this decoupled analysis method can adequately simulate the structure's response if the forcing frequencies of the loads do not approach the structure's natural frequency. The interface between the two models is the yaw bearing that connects the wind turbine to the tower.…”
Section: Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The full aero-hydro-servo-elastic behavior of the structure was represented by two decoupled models. It has been noted [4] that this decoupled analysis method can adequately simulate the structure's response if the forcing frequencies of the loads do not approach the structure's natural frequency. The interface between the two models is the yaw bearing that connects the wind turbine to the tower.…”
Section: Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This increase in the structure's flexibility, following the decrease in the soil stiffness, changes the structure's responses under a certain loading case. Abhinav and Saha reported that the displacement of the wind turbine in soft clay exceeded the serviceability limit of 0.2 m at mudline. Harte et al investigated the along‐wind forced vibration response of an onshore wind turbine.…”
Section: Effects Of Base Dynamics On Foundation Loadsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The literature shows that the reduction in the natural frequency is usually associated with higher displacement response, for example, Abhinav and Saha showed that for a 5 MW NREL wind turbine installed in 20 m water depth with a monopole foundation system, the natural frequency was 0.24 Hz for stiff clay soil, and was reduced by 12.5% and 33.3% when the soil type was changed to medium stiff clay and soft clay, respectively. This increase in the structure's flexibility, following the decrease in the soil stiffness, changes the structure's responses under a certain loading case.…”
Section: Effects Of Base Dynamics On Foundation Loadsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These simulations are, therefore, often carried out with different analysis methods, such as frequency-domain calculations (van der Tempel and de Vries, 2005;Ziegler et al, 2015), substructuring techniques (van der Valk and Rixen, 2012), and/or simplified or reduced models . For most of the reduced models the aerodynamic loading is simplified by removing the rotor nacelle assembly from the support structure and replacing the aeroelastic computation with precomputed or stochastic generated rotor loads acting as a point force or moment at tower top (Dong et al, 2011;Abhinav and Saha, 2015;Kim and Lee, 2015;van der Male and Lourens, 2015;Schløer, et al, 2016;Ong et al, 2017) The main advantages are the faster simulation time, since the aeroelastic computation rather is a time-consuming task, and the possibility to use standard finite-element or multi-body software . It has been shown that the use of rotor load time series combined with an efficient substructuring technique (van der Valk and Rixen, 2012) can speed up the dynamic analysis for a commercial support structure design by a factor of 375.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%