2019
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-28377-3_40
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dynamic Airspace Configuration: A Short Review of Computational Approaches

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 28 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance, Tang et al (2012) identified the gaps in existing 3D sectorization methods and presented a new approach based on minimizing four different Key Performance Indicatorss (KPIs). Similarly, Graña (2019) presented a detailed literature review on computational approaches to improve airspace configuration and solve DCB issues. Other examples are Melgosa et al (2019), where trajectory optimization is used to alleviate DCB problems, and Xu & Prats (2018) that presented a method to introduce linear holding to absorb ATFM.…”
Section: Iii1 State Of the Artmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, Tang et al (2012) identified the gaps in existing 3D sectorization methods and presented a new approach based on minimizing four different Key Performance Indicatorss (KPIs). Similarly, Graña (2019) presented a detailed literature review on computational approaches to improve airspace configuration and solve DCB issues. Other examples are Melgosa et al (2019), where trajectory optimization is used to alleviate DCB problems, and Xu & Prats (2018) that presented a method to introduce linear holding to absorb ATFM.…”
Section: Iii1 State Of the Artmentioning
confidence: 99%