Dyadic organizational communication: is the dyad different?

Panko, Raymond R.; Kinney, Susan T.

doi:10.1109/hicss.1992.183435

Cited by 14 publications

(11 citation statements)

References 22 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…To summarize, the Panko and Kinney (1996) study found that project teams are already widespread, with almost 90% of respondents saying that they had worked on a project in the last six months. These projects, furthermore, were substantial in size.…”

Section: The Importance Of Project Teamsmentioning

confidence: 95%

“…However, the Panko and Kinney (1996) respondents were very satisfied with the sizes of their project teams. When asked about the best team size, 69% said that the actual size was the best size, and those that wanted a change were almost equally split between those wanting an increase (12%) and those wanting a decrease (19%).…”

Section: Satisfaction and Adoptionmentioning

confidence: 98%

“…Ghoshal and Bartlett (1995) argue that a number of leading edge organizations are already heavily team-based. Panko and Kinney (1996) conducted three surveys of working professionals to learn about the respondents' participation in project teams. In the first two surveys, subjects began with a check.off box on whether they had participated in a project team at work in the last six months.…”

Section: The Importance Of Project Teamsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Satisfaction with Team Size Panko and Kinney (1996) asked a number of satisfaction questions of their project team respondents. They first asked about satisfaction with the number of members on the project team.…”

Section: Satisfaction and Adoptionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The Panko and Kinney (1996) study also asked a number of questions about satisfaction with performance and team interactions, using 7-point agreedisagree Likert scales. The answers indicated overwhelming satisfaction with the project work.…”

Section: Satisfaction Regarding Participation and Performancementioning

confidence: 99%

See 4 more Smart Citations

Satisfaction, technology adoption, and performance in project teams

Panko

Kinney

1998

SIGDOC Asterisk J. Comput. Doc.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Rita Vick's paper focuses on technology adoption and performance in teamwork contexts. One way to increase performance, she argues, is to increase information sharing. This commentary argues that adoption, performance, and information sharing may depend on satisfaction with current project work. The paper notes that there is evidence that satisfaction with project work is very high. If this is the case, then the adoption of teamwork technologies should continue to be slow. Furthermore, high satisfaction can have a negative impact on group performance, because it may cause team members not to stress challenging information that could disrupt team harmony. We suggest that the experiments that Vick proposes consider satisfaction and consider not only general information sharing but also classify information shared in terms of potential divi. siveness.

show abstract

Section: The Importance Of Project Teamsmentioning

confidence: 95%

Section: Satisfaction and Adoptionmentioning

confidence: 98%

Section: The Importance Of Project Teamsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Satisfaction and Adoptionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Satisfaction Regarding Participation and Performancementioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations