2022
DOI: 10.1002/essoar.10511698.1
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dust, sand, and winds within an active Martian storm in Jezero crater

Abstract: However, in situ documentation of active lifting within storms has remained elusive. Over 5-11 January 2022 (L S 153°-156°), a dust storm passed over the Perseverance rover site. Peak visible optical depth was ∼2, and visibility across the crater was briefly reduced. Pressure amplitudes and temperatures responded to the storm. Winds up to 20 m s −1 rotated around the site before the wind sensor was damaged. The rover imaged 21 dust-lifting events-gusts and dust devils-in one 25-min period, and at least three e… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
32
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

5
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
(33 reference statements)
2
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(2021). This event also matches with the timing of an excess grain motion between two consecutive SuperCam images of this target, confirming the strong atmospheric activity at this time (Lemmon et al., 2022). Therefore, microphone data could have caught shear‐driven gusts, as already observed on Mars by InSight (Chatain et al., 2021).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(2021). This event also matches with the timing of an excess grain motion between two consecutive SuperCam images of this target, confirming the strong atmospheric activity at this time (Lemmon et al., 2022). Therefore, microphone data could have caught shear‐driven gusts, as already observed on Mars by InSight (Chatain et al., 2021).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 80%
“…The agreement with both warm and climatology scenarii is excellent up to L s = 140°. Thereafter, the in situ data match better with the warm scenario (Figure 2a) which is concomitant with the increase of dust seen at Jezero (Lemmon et al., 2022), making this season warmer than the multi‐year averaged prediction. In fact, daytime atmospheric temperatures after L s = 130° remain even higher than the MCD predictions for the warm scenario, highlighting the strong impact of local dust lifting events occurring in Jezero on the near‐surface temperatures (Newman et al., 2022).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…Third, dust lifting was easier (had a lower threshold) in disturbed material (such as rover tracks or earlier flight paths) than in undisturbed material. This is unsurprising and consistent with observations of more sediment motion in disturbed versus undisturbed material in a dust storm (Lemmon et al., 2022). Fourth, sand mobilization cannot explain all dust lifting.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…The last process is least understood and in greatest need of investigation (Newman, Bertrand, et al., 2022). Dust lifting has been observed in both straight‐line winds and vortices (dust‐devils), which may be roughly equally important both outside dust storms (Newman, Hueso, et al., 2022) and during the onset of regional storms (Lemmon et al., 2022).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Summarizing what was observed regarding wind speeds during the onset of the storm at Jezero, mean winds were slightly greater during the storm than in pre‐storm conditions. On the other hand, vortex activity strongly increased during the storm, particularly in early stages (Lemmon et al., 2022) and provoked a higher probability of close encounters. One of these encounters at sol 313, 13:42, produced an intense wind gust reaching extreme wind speeds greater than 20 ms −1 that damaged the WS.…”
Section: Effects Of the My36/2022a Regional Dust Storm On The Surface...mentioning
confidence: 99%