1998
DOI: 10.1177/004051759806800707
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Durable Water-Repellent Cotton Fabrics Prepared by Low-Degree Substitution of Long Chain Alkyl Groups

Abstract: Three kinds of water-repellent cotton fabrics, A, B, and C-, are produced by alkylation with only 0.07 alkyl units per glucose unit. Sample A is prepared by alkylation by means of acetylation without mercerization, B is by direct alkylation after merceriza tion, and C is by alkylation by means of allylation and bromination. The merits of the methods are compared by contact angle measurements and spray tests after repeated laundry cycles. Sufficient water-repellency is attained with an alkyl length of over C12.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Ideal water repellent cotton fabrics are hydrophobic on the fiber surfaces to resist water, yet porous to allow moisture transport for comfort. Efforts to reduce the hydrophilicity of cotton have involved surface modification using hydrophobic compounds, such as fluorocarbons (Jiang et al 2005;McCord et al 2003;Sato et al 1994), silicones (Lee et al 2005;Yuen et al 2005) and hydrocarbons (Sawatari et al 1998). These technologies have varying effectiveness and durability in achieving water repellent cotton fabrics although are limited by their sustainability and environmental concerns and cost.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ideal water repellent cotton fabrics are hydrophobic on the fiber surfaces to resist water, yet porous to allow moisture transport for comfort. Efforts to reduce the hydrophilicity of cotton have involved surface modification using hydrophobic compounds, such as fluorocarbons (Jiang et al 2005;McCord et al 2003;Sato et al 1994), silicones (Lee et al 2005;Yuen et al 2005) and hydrocarbons (Sawatari et al 1998). These technologies have varying effectiveness and durability in achieving water repellent cotton fabrics although are limited by their sustainability and environmental concerns and cost.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Imparting water repellency to cotton fabric has previously been done by coating with perfluoro ester aziridines, 18,19 zirconium compounds, 20 crosslinking of fluorocarbon resins, 21 and by low-degree substitution of long-chain alkyl groups. 22 All these methods are time consuming, use wet chemistry, and may cause environmental pollution because of the use of additives and catalysts. In addition, treated cotton fabric may lose some important characteristics such as comfort.…”
Section: Cotton Fabric Graft Copolymerizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1986 (A-3) as described before [ 16], except that th< temperature was 60°C throughout. Tensile strength anc elongation of the test fabric, 40 mm long and 20 mn wide, were tested before and after laundering at a strait rate of 15 mm/minute.…”
Section: Flame Retardancymentioning
confidence: 99%