2014
DOI: 10.1007/s12205-012-0457-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Durability of cement mortars incorporating limestone filler exposed to sodium sulfate solution

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The formation of carbonated products was expected unless the exposure environment is prevented from carbonation, 38 whereas thaumasite would have been formed due to the interaction of sulfate and carbonated phases with the C─S─H. It is also true that beside carbonation cluster, low temperature and highly humid conditions favor the thaumasite formation 16 . In BFS‐free system, the intensity of degradation products can be characterized as weak and crumbled corroborated by the constant strength gain (Figure 5) and minimal weight loss data (Figure 11) owing to the dearth of 273% CaO content in the BFS‐free system compared to BFS‐blended system (Table 2) as well as less formation of Ca‐based products (Figure 12 left) enabling less decalcification within the exposure period of this study.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The formation of carbonated products was expected unless the exposure environment is prevented from carbonation, 38 whereas thaumasite would have been formed due to the interaction of sulfate and carbonated phases with the C─S─H. It is also true that beside carbonation cluster, low temperature and highly humid conditions favor the thaumasite formation 16 . In BFS‐free system, the intensity of degradation products can be characterized as weak and crumbled corroborated by the constant strength gain (Figure 5) and minimal weight loss data (Figure 11) owing to the dearth of 273% CaO content in the BFS‐free system compared to BFS‐blended system (Table 2) as well as less formation of Ca‐based products (Figure 12 left) enabling less decalcification within the exposure period of this study.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They reported that the performance of all blended cement mortar was better than that of the control mortar specimens due to the nonexistence or reduction in the quantity of portlandite. The destructive nature of PC mortar is reflected by the coexistence of gypsum, ettringite, and thaumasite 15,16 . Several other researchers 10,17–19 also reported superior durability characteristics of FA, lignite bottom ash, lithomarge/kaolin, cement kiln dust, electric arc furnace slag, and ground lead smelted slag‐based AABs compared to PC counterparts immersed in 5% Na 2 SO 4 for up to 360 days.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Figure 13-1 presents the expansion ratio (PLC/OPC) of mortars with plain cements subjected to sodium sulfate solution according to ASTM C1012 at different amounts of limestone in the mixture [156][157][158][159]. Similarly, Figure 13-2 presents the expansion ratio (PLC/OPC) of mortars with SCMs subjected to sodium sulfate solution according to ASTM C1012 at different amounts of limestone in the mixture [160][161][162][163].…”
Section: Background and Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Simultaneously, the effects of mineral admixtures including fly ash, slag, limestone, silica fume, ground bagasse ash, micro-particle additives on the mechanical properties of mortars were investigated [1,26,27]. For example, Ryou et al [28] represented the relationship of the replacement ratio and limestone on durability of mortar, and the results demonstrated that both the high fineness level and the replacement ratio had a negative effect in resisting sodium sulfate attacks. Chindaprasirt et al [29] discussed the effect of fly ash fineness on strength, drying shrinkage, and sulfate resistance; they presented that the fly ashes can have a significant improvement in drying shrinkage and resistance to sulfuric acid attack.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%