2012
DOI: 10.1016/s0003-2778(12)80009-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Duplication of Optic Canal in Human Skulls

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The distal end of the OC is narrower than the proximal end [29]; the intracranial and orbital openings having average dimensions of 6.25 x 3.70 mm and 4.75 x 5.46 mm, respectively [4]. The canal itself is 8 - 12 mm long and is duplicated in 2.57% of skulls [30]. …”
Section: Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The distal end of the OC is narrower than the proximal end [29]; the intracranial and orbital openings having average dimensions of 6.25 x 3.70 mm and 4.75 x 5.46 mm, respectively [4]. The canal itself is 8 - 12 mm long and is duplicated in 2.57% of skulls [30]. …”
Section: Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Choudhry et al [3] have estimated the average length of optic canal in their study as 9-11 mm. Ghai et al [8] have reported the average length as 8-12 mm in their study. Thus, many authors have reported about the incidence of the duplicate optic canal in their studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…Duplication of the optic canal has been reported by many authors. Ghai et al [8] have reported 5 skulls (2.57%) with duplication of optic canal. Out of the 5 skulls, 3 skulls (1.5%) had bilateral, and 2 skulls (1.03%) had unilateral duplication.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Ghai et al, studied 194 skulls, in that 5(2.57%) showed duplication of optic canal. Out of these three skulls showed bilateral (1.5%) and two skulls showed left sided unilateral (1.03%) [2]. Choudhry et al,observed optic canal in three skulls, in that two were bilateral and one was unilateral and postulated that this bony projection when large, could result in the division of optic canal into two parts, upper larger for the optic nerve and the lower smaller for the ophthalmic artery [3].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%