Duel or Dual: An Interdisciplinary Approach to Parenting Coordination for Uber‐Conflicted Parenting Relationships

Abstract

Parenting coordination for families struggling with severe conflict can be challenging for both the family and the parenting coordinator (PC). These families can put an inordinate strain on the PC as they lobby their positions and try to bias the PC against the other parent. The interdisciplinary dual‐PC model is an innovative approach using aspects of the collaborative practice model to enhance the efficacy of the process while utilizing the strengths of both disciplines. Through a case illustration, the identification of the family dynamics and situations that give rise to use of this approach shall become clear. This article also demonstrates the potential benefits to both the family and the PCs. All aspects synthesize into a cohesive, well‐balanced approach to the uber‐conflicted parenting relationships.

Working on what works: A critical reflection on the past, present, and future of parenting education programs for divorcing and separating parents

“…Scholars have also highlighted the need to create programming that meets the needs of additional families, including increasing methods to recruit unmarried coparents who are not going through the legal system (Shcramm & Becher, 2020), and developing culturally responsive or culturally specific programs as well as specialized programming for families (e.g., LGBTQ couples; Schramm & Becher, 2020). In this special issue, Bergevin et al (2024) provided a description of a parenting education program developed specifically for Indigenous peoples. They describe the ways in which they purposefully and meaningfully engaged with Indigenous community representatives to develop this culturally specific program.…”

The emperor has no clothes: A systemic view of the status and future of child custody evaluation (CCE)

“…Although the spirit of RFR would seem sound -that is, to assure that a child is not left with a babysitter while his/her/their other parent is available to step in-in practice it can be very disruptive to the child. More to the point, RFR implicitly invites co-parents to monitor one another's activities with one eye on the clock, ready to file for contempt every time a meeting runs late, or traffic slows a commute (Brown et al, 2017). 18 Parenting and co-parenting (and thereby the child's well-being) are better served by the carrot than the stick.…”

El Coordinador de Parentalidad: Un análisis de las resoluciones judiciales en España

“…A inicios de los 90, la CP surge como un nuevo procedimiento ADR (Carter, 2011) para resolver los casos altamente conflictivos de ruptura de pareja con hijos menores de edad. A este respecto, se mencionan como pioneros de la CP los estados de California y Colorado (Kelly, 2014;Sullivan, 2013), siendo Oklahoma, en 2001, el primer estado en desarrollar una norma legal para darle soporte (Kelly, 2014), siguiéndole rápidamente otros en conferirle una regulación estatutaria ad hoc (Brown, Behrman, y Zimmerman, 2017;Montiel, 2015). Si bien no todos los estados cuentan con dicha regulación (Ordway, 2015), actualmente esta práctica se encuentra asentada en todo el territorio norteamericano, tanto en Canadá como en Estados Unidos, siendo muchos los estados en los que se ha implantado activamente (Behrman, 2016;Neff y Cooper, 2004;Parks, Tindall y Yingling, 2011).…”