1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0962-1849(97)80002-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dual-relationship prohibitions: A concept whose time never should have come

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
37
0
1

Year Published

1998
1998
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
37
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Clients may potentially discover online information about their therapist that includes legal information, private phone numbers and addresses, household composition, the value and structure of a psychologists' home (and photographs), ratings of a therapist by other clients, blog postings, personal images, videos, professional and personal websites, news articles written by or about therapists, professional publications and research articles, and links to social media profiles. In addition to understanding online self-disclosures, psychologists may need to prepare themselves to navigate potential online boundary violations by becoming familiar with the nature of multiple relationships (Bamett, Lazarus, Vasquez, MoorheadSlaughter, & Johnson, 2007;Borys & Pope, 1989;Ebert, 1997;Pipes, 1997) and ethical decision-making models (Gottlieb, 1993;Kitchener, 1984). According to the American Psychological Association (2010), multiple relationships occur when a psychologist is currently in a professional role with a person and either is simultaneously in or promises to be in another role with that person or someone closely associated with that person.…”
Section: Preventing and Managing Boundary Violations Onlinementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clients may potentially discover online information about their therapist that includes legal information, private phone numbers and addresses, household composition, the value and structure of a psychologists' home (and photographs), ratings of a therapist by other clients, blog postings, personal images, videos, professional and personal websites, news articles written by or about therapists, professional publications and research articles, and links to social media profiles. In addition to understanding online self-disclosures, psychologists may need to prepare themselves to navigate potential online boundary violations by becoming familiar with the nature of multiple relationships (Bamett, Lazarus, Vasquez, MoorheadSlaughter, & Johnson, 2007;Borys & Pope, 1989;Ebert, 1997;Pipes, 1997) and ethical decision-making models (Gottlieb, 1993;Kitchener, 1984). According to the American Psychological Association (2010), multiple relationships occur when a psychologist is currently in a professional role with a person and either is simultaneously in or promises to be in another role with that person or someone closely associated with that person.…”
Section: Preventing and Managing Boundary Violations Onlinementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Brownlee (1996) cited some writers who maintain that all nonsexual multiple relationships should be avoided at all costs. Ebert (1997) argued that it was not the intent of the ethics code, or of the majority of writers on ethics, to prohibit all dual relationships, but that "I have often heard psychologists as well as my students conclude that all dual relationships must be avoided" (p. 146). One survey of psychologists demonstrated that there is wide disagreement as to whether nonsexual dual relationships are ethical (Borys & Pope, 1989).…”
Section: Multiple Relationshipsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors repeatedly emphasized the primacy of seeking consultation with other mental health professionals to examine one's motives and to help identify potential risks and concerns to which the therapist may be blind. Ebert (1997) provided a model based on conflict of interest rather than multiple relationships as discussed thus far. He argued that the construct of multiple relationships is not very useful and often leads to confusion.…”
Section: Decision-making Models To Resolve Dilemmasmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Dolayısıyla, LGBT grubu ile çalışan terapistlerin heteroseksüel terapistlere kıyasla daha çok çoklu ilişki içinde olma potansiyeli taşıdığı düşünülmektedir. [33][34] Bu durum hem akademik çalışmaları hem de danışmanlık sürecini etkileyebilir. Örneğin, bilimsel çalışmalarda araştırmacıların katılımcıların terapisti, arkadaşı veya iş arkadaşı olabildiğini, bunun sonucunda da oluşan çoklu ilişkilerin sonuçları etkileyebileceği ileri sürülmektedir.…”
unclassified