2014
DOI: 10.1149/2.036404jes
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dual-Beam FIB/SEM Characterization, Statistical Reconstruction, and Pore Scale Modeling of a PEMFC Catalyst Layer

Abstract: The three-dimensional structure of a PEMFC catalyst layer (CL) was obtained using a dual beam Focused Ion Beam/Scanning Electron Microscope (FIB/SEM). Lower order statistical functions such as porosity and two point correlation functions calculated from the FIB/SEM data were used in the numerical reconstruction of a multi-phase CL domain. A 'carbon-sphere-based' initial seed structure, when optimized by simulated annealing, produced a structure for which the two point correlation function matched with the FIB/… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
25
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
(53 reference statements)
0
25
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Reconstruction of a heterogeneous material to obtain the microstructure can be performed using different experimental methods. Recently, X‐ray nano/micro‐computed tomography (CT) and focused ion beam/scanning electron microscopy (FIB/SEM) have been widely used to reconstruct the porous medium 3D microstructures. Ostadi et al created GDL‐microporous layer (MPL) assembly through X‐ray nano tomography and FIB/SEM, respectively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reconstruction of a heterogeneous material to obtain the microstructure can be performed using different experimental methods. Recently, X‐ray nano/micro‐computed tomography (CT) and focused ion beam/scanning electron microscopy (FIB/SEM) have been widely used to reconstruct the porous medium 3D microstructures. Ostadi et al created GDL‐microporous layer (MPL) assembly through X‐ray nano tomography and FIB/SEM, respectively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, rather than to solve physically correct models (for instance MaxwelleStephan two phase flow instead of Fick's law in a PEMFC catalyst layer [7] or the questionable application of Ohm's law at the nanometer scale), this study intends to sensitize the reader to carefully question the reliability of FIB-SEMt based parameter calculations.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With a few exceptions [13][14][15], the most common method used in the literature to describe these resistances is the spherical agglomerate model by idealising the CL as a packing of isolated spheres [16,17]. This idealisation not only oversimplifies the CL structure [4,[18][19][20][21], but is also self-defeating. For example, its assumption of isolated and non-touched spheres physically makes the CL insulate to electrons as electrons can only transport through the carbon grains.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%